BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut custom home Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut production housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut condominiums Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut high-rise construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut retail construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut hospital construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut institutional building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut condominium Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut multi family housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut low-income housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut custom homes Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut Subterranean parking Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut Medical building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut tract home Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut industrial building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut mid-rise construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut townhome construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut structural steel construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut casino resort Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut office building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut
    Fairfield Connecticut consulting general contractorFairfield Connecticut roofing construction expertFairfield Connecticut building envelope expert witnessFairfield Connecticut architectural expert witnessFairfield Connecticut construction cost estimating expert witnessFairfield Connecticut testifying construction expert witnessFairfield Connecticut building expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fairfield Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Fairfield Connecticut


    Balancing Risk and Reward: The Complexities of Stadium Construction Projects

    Contractor Sues Yelp Reviewer for Defamation

    Indiana Court Enforces Contract Provisions rather than Construction Drawing Markings

    Broker Not Negligent When Insured Rejects Additional Coverage

    California Trial Court Clarifies Application of SB800 Roofing Standards and Expert’s Opinions

    Roots of Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Reach Back a Decade

    Why Metro Atlanta Is the Poster Child for the US Housing Crisis

    There Are Consequences to Executed Documents Such as the Accord and Satisfaction Defense

    Will Superusers Future-Proof the AEC Industry?

    Landlords Beware: Subordination Agreements

    Eighth Circuit Rejects Retroactive Application of Construction Defect Legislation

    Henderson Engineers Tests AI for Building Systems Design with Torch.AI

    Colorado Senate Voted to Kill One of Three Construction Defect Bills

    Where Did That Punch List Term Come From Anyway?

    ASCE Statement On House Passage Of The Precip Act

    Weyerhaeuser Leaving Home Building Business

    Preserving Lien Rights on Private Projects in Washington: Three Common Mistakes to Avoid

    Caltrans to Speak before California Senate regarding Bay Bridge Expansion

    Homeowner's Mold Claim Denied Due to Spoilation

    E-Commerce Logistics Test Limits of Tilt-Up Construction

    Another Setback for the New Staten Island Courthouse

    Zombie Foreclosures Plaguing Various Cities in the U.S.

    End of an Era: Los Angeles County Superior Court Closes the Personal Injury Hub

    Women in Construction Aren’t Silent Anymore. They Are Using TikTok to Battle Discrimination

    School District Client Advisory: Civility is not an Option, It is a Duty

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

    Congratulations 2020 DE, MA, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Second Circuit Affirms Win for General Contractor on No Damages for Delay Provision

    Relying Upon Improper Exclusion to Deny Coverage Allows Bad Faith Claim to Survive Summary Judgment

    Construction Contracts and The Uniform Commercial Code: When Does it Apply and Understanding the Pre-Dominant Factor Test

    London Is Falling Down and It's Because of Climate Change

    Court Finds that Subcontractor Lacks Standing to Appeal Summary Judgment Order Simply Because Subcontractor “Might” Lose at Trial Due to Order

    BHA Has a Nice Swing

    HOA Group Speaking Out Against Draft of Colorado’s Construction Defects Bill

    Insurance Lawyers Recognized by JD Supra 2020 Readers' Choice Awards

    Contractor Changes Contract After Signed, Then Sues Older Woman for Breaking It

    A Court-Side Seat: “Inholdings” Upheld, a Pecos Bill Come Due and Agency Actions Abound

    Congratulations to our 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    A Court-Side Seat: May Brings Federal Appellate Courts Rulings and Executive Orders

    U.K. Developer Pledges Building Safety in Wake of Grenfell

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Litigation Privilege Saves the Day for Mechanic’s Liens

    Coronavirus, Force Majeure, and Delay and Time-Impact Claims

    Construction Spending Drops in March

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    Float-In of MassDOT Span Sails, But Delay Dispute Lingers

    Happenings in and around the West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Recent Regulatory Activity

    Topic 606: A Retrospective Review of Revenue from Contracts with Customers

    Is Construction Defect Notice under Florida Repair Statute a Suit?
    Corporate Profile

    FAIRFIELD CONNECTICUT BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Fairfield, Connecticut Building Consultant Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Fairfield's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Utilities’ Extreme Plan to Stop Wildfires: Shut Off the Power

    October 28, 2024 —
    A growing number of utilities are resorting to an extreme measure to prevent their equipment from sparking catastrophic wildfires: turning off the power. Electric companies serving about 24 million homes and businesses across the fire-prone US West now have plans to preemptively cut electricity during dangerous fire conditions, according to an analysis of data compiled by researchers at Stanford University. The proactive blackouts, however, run counter to the power companies’ main mission — which is to keep the lights on. And that’s angering customers and officials. Lawsuits — and the billions of dollars of damage claims that come with them — are an increasing concern among utilities, said Michael Wara, who leads the Climate and Energy Policy Program at Stanford University. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark Chediak, Bloomberg

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Fall Forum Meeting in Pittsburgh

    December 03, 2024 —
    Over 500 construction law attorneys and consultants convened last week at the confluence of three rivers in what became the first-ever meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania of the ABA Forum on Construction Law. The Steel City was a fitting backdrop for a meeting focused on issues of design in construction. Thanks to the hard work of many, most notably the newly minted Forum Chair Keith Bergeron and Meeting Coordinators Kendall Woods and Michael Clark, the meeting's attendees brought home new connections and a host of new lessons learned. Read on for my top 10 take-aways from the 2024 Fall Meeting in Pittsburgh and feel free to share yours in the comments below. 10. An architect's standard of care does not require perfection. A common refrain across many of the meeting's plenary sessions was that any design that is produced by human hands will never be perfect. In recognition of our own fallibility, the legal standard to which design professionals will be held to account does not require that their designs be error-free. A design professional must generally exercise the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals performing similar services under similar circumstances. Establishing what that means in each locality will vary and will most likely need to be supported by the expert opinion of another practicing design professional. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Marissa L. Downs, Laurie & Brennan, LLP
    Ms. Downs may be contacted at mdowns@lauriebrennan.com

    First Circuit Finds No Coverage For Subcontracted Faulty Work

    December 17, 2024 —
    After almost two years' deliberation, the First Circuit last week issued its long-awaited decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Tocci Bldg. Corp.[1]: affirming on other grounds, and leaving in place a district court decision that found subcontracted faulty work was not an "occurrence" and did not lead to covered “property damage” under Massachusetts law. The decision leaves Massachusetts among a number of states where general contractors should not expect coverage from their commercial general liability (CGL) insurers for damage falling within the contractor’s scope of work. Since the "scope of work" – where general contractors are involved – often encompasses an entire project, contractors who want coverage in Massachusetts should take care to make alternative arrangements: transferring risk to subcontractors through indemnity provisions and additional-insured endorsements, or relying on other policy forms where available. Reprinted courtesy of Eric Hermanson, White and Williams LLP and Austin Moody, White and Williams LLP Mr. Hermanson may be contacted at hermansone@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Moody may be contacted at moodya@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey

    November 11, 2024 —
    Products liability is an area of law that both sides of the aisle vigorously litigate. Like in most litigation, products liability claims provide subrogation attorneys with an important means of prosecuting cases against manufacturers, sellers, and other entities in the stream of commerce. Of course, these claims also come with numerous “buyer beware” requirements. New Jersey allows products liability claims and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (District Court) clarified how such claims should be plead in Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co. a/s/o David Krug vs. Stihl, Inc., No. 22-05893, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178804 (D. N.J.). After becoming subrogated to the rights of its insured, Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Cambridge) filed suit against Stihl, Inc. (Stihl) in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County, Law Division. Stihl then removed the case to federal court. Once in federal court, Stihl filed a motion to dismiss the action. The District Court granted the motion, doing so in part with prejudice and in part without prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lian Skaf, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Skaf may be contacted at skafl@whiteandwilliams.com

    A Chicago Skyscraper Cements the Legacy of a Visionary Postmodern Architect

    December 31, 2024 —
    A handsome and eclectic stretch of buildings along Michigan Avenue known as “Chicago’s Front Door” offers a view that reflects the city’s status as a destination for serious architecture. Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler’s Auditorium Building, where a young Frank Lloyd Wright designed interiors, is right there on Grant Park; so is Daniel Burnham’s Railway Exchange, where he drew up the 1909 Plan of Chicago. Now a glass-and-aluminum apartment tower anchors the southern end of this scene, filling in a rare gap within this landmarked streetwall and putting a bow on the career of another heroic figure in Chicago’s architectural history: Helmut Jahn. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark Byrnes, Bloomberg

    Chambers USA Names Peckar & Abramson to Band 1 Level in Construction Law; 29 P&A Lawyers Recognized as Leading Attorneys; Six Regions and Government Contracts Practice Recognized

    July 08, 2024 —
    Peckar & Abramson, P.C. (P&A) is pleased to announce that Chambers USA has recognized the firm at the Band 1 level nationwide in Construction Law. P&A stands alone in being named a Band 1 firm in Construction Law nationally and has been named in the position every year since Chambers USA began awarding the recognition. The firm was also recognized nationally in Government Contracts: Highly Regarded. P&A’s offices in New York, New Jersey, Florida, and Texas were ranked Band 1 in Construction Law, and the Firm’s California, Illinois, and Washington, DC practices were also highly rated. Additionally, 29 of P&A’s construction lawyers were named leading construction lawyers in their respective jurisdictions – more than any other construction law practice in the country. As demonstrated by its consistent Chambers USA Rankings, Peckar & Abramson has earned a national reputation for exceptional legal advocacy, representing construction industry members domestically and internationally. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Peckar & Abramson, P.C.

    Bremer Whyte Sets New Precedent in Palos Verdes Landslide Litigation

    August 26, 2024 —
    In what is believed to be a groundbreaking new precedent, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara’s Los Angeles litigation team has obtained a landmark ruling on behalf of residents in the “Portuguese Bend” neighborhood of Palos Verdes, California. Congratulations to Partner Michael D’Andrea and Senior Associate Shelly Mosallaei in receiving this result for our clients. Plaintiff, a real estate developer, sued a number of local residents and property owners, including our client, alleging that their failure to address landslides and geological disturbances around Plaintiff’s property constituted a legal trespass and nuisance. Plaintiff alleged that its plans to develop multiple lots in Palos Verdes was thwarted because Defendant’s soil and land encroached onto Plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff’s suit against multiple residents created an uproar in the community regarding who was ultimately responsible (if anyone) for natural soils movement that has plagued this neighborhood for years. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Injured Worker Despite Contractor's Exclusion

    August 05, 2024 —
    The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's finding that the policy covered a worker's injuries despite the Contractor's Exclusion. Cal. Spec. Insulation . Allied Work Surplus Lines, Ins. Co., 2024 Cal. App. LEXIS 317 (Cal. Ct. App. May 17, 2024). Air Control Systems, Inc. was retained by a property owner to perform improvement work on a building. Air Control retained California Specialty Insulation, Inc. (CSI) to install duct insulation. Jason Standiford, an Air Control employee, sure CSI, asserting negligence for injuries he suffered when he fell 16 to 20 feet after. A CSI employee drove a scissor lift into a ladder he was standing on. CSI was insured through a commercial general liability policy from Allied World. The policy included an endorsement titled "Bodily Injury to Any Employee or Temporary Worker of Contractors Exclusion." The Contractor Exclusion state the policy did not apply to "'Bodily injury' . . . to any 'employee' or 'ten,poary work' of any contractor or subcontractor arising out of in or the course of the rendering or performing services of any kind or nature by such contractor or subcontractor." Neither the endorsement nor the policy defined the term "contractor." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com