Fee Simple!
November 11, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyFollowing the grant of summary judgment by a Nebraska federal court on a construction claim, the prevailing subcontractor sought recovery of attorney’s fees, but received pushback from its opponent based upon the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The general contractor urged “that attorney’s fees are ‘special damages’ that must be specifically pleaded within a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(g).” The GC said that a prayer for “a judgment for… costs, interest, and attorney’s fees be entered” – without further asserting a statutory or factual basis for the recovery – is insufficient. The subcontractor shot back that “it complied with the requirements of Rule 9(g) because its prayer for relief expressly referenced attorney’s fees, and the request for such fees was based on the facts asserted in the pleadings themselves.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
Designer of World’s Tallest Building Wants to Turn Skyscrapers Into Batteries
July 31, 2024 —
Will Wade - BloombergThe architecture firm that designed the world’s tallest building is considering ways to build skyscrapers that can store energy using gravity.
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP has developed a series of prototype designs that use electric motors to elevate massive blocks, creating potential energy that can be converted into electricity when the blocks are lowered. The designs are based on technology developed by partner Energy Vault Holdings Inc. as an alternative to lithium-ion batteries and other types of chemical cells. They are seeking developer partners interested in offsetting greenhouse gas pollution from buildings, which the United Nations estimates are responsible for almost 40% of global emissions.
The concept is similar to widely used pumped hydroelectric plants. Energy Vault completed its first major project this month near Shanghai, a stand-alone storage system that can supply as much as 25 megawatts of power for four hours. Other companies are testing new types of gravity storage systems, including ones using abandoned oil wells and mines.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Will Wade, Bloomberg
Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut
July 22, 2024 —
Bill Wilson - Construction Law ZoneThe Connecticut Appellate Court recently provided guidance on what does not constitute property damage under a typical contractor’s Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance policy in Westchester Modular Homes of Fairfield County, Inc. v. Arbella Protection Ins. Co., 224 Conn App. 526 (2024). In this case, the contractor defended construction defect claims brought by an owner and then sued its insurer to recover $500,000 in defense costs for failing to provide a defense under the contractor’s policy. In Connecticut, an insurer is obligated to provide a defense based on what is alleged in a complaint and if it has actual knowledge of any facts establishing a reasonable possibility of coverage. The contractor provided extrinsic evidence for two defects claimed by the owner: (1) windows were installed improperly such that water was collecting and will continue to collect in the window soffit areas and eventually rot the wall, and (2) the vapor barrier was not installed in the second-floor ceiling which will result in water condensation and water damage to the roof structure if not remedied.
The insurer relied on typical provisions included in most CGL policies. The insurer has no duty to defend the insured against any suit seeking damages for property damage to which the insurance does not apply. The term “property damage” is defined as “physical injury to tangible property, including all resulting loss of use of that property.” Under well-established Connecticut law, the phrase “physical injury” unambiguously connotes damage to tangible property, causing an alteration in appearance, shape, color, or some other material dimension. It is also well-established that claims for property damage caused by defective work are covered under a CGL policy but claims for repair of the defective work itself are not. The insurer denied any duty to defend because no coverage was triggered under the liability policy. Both parties moved for summary judgment.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bill Wilson, Robinson & Cole LLPMr. Wilson may be contacted at
wwilson@rc.com
Corrective Action Protest Grounds for GSA Schedule Federal Construction Contractors
September 09, 2024 —
Marissa L. Downs - The Dispute ResolverA contract awarded, protested, terminated, appealed, then reinstated. It’s no secret that federal construction procurements are plagued with uncertainty. From delays, constructive suspensions, compromised supply chains, the litigation-laden critical path method, and the mandate for all construction materials used in federally funded projects for infrastructure to be produced in the United States under the Build America, Buy America Act (BABAA) (to name just a few traditional and emerging favorites), just one of these issues could fill the rest of anyone’s month with substantive research. To add one more, which is entirely unique to bid protests, federal contractors–including construction contractors–listed in a General Service Administration (GSA) Schedule may have new grounds to have a contract award reinstated that was terminated by a federal agency pending a GAO decision.
GAO Protest
An initial GAO protest filed by Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) argued that the National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency (Agency) wrongfully made an award to Kearney & Company, P.C. (Kearney) when the Agency: (1) improperly evaluated quotes; and (2) failed to conduct a proper best-value tradeoff analysis. At issue was a competed task order with Kearney under a GSA FSS multiple-award contract. Before the GAO issued an opinion, however, it held an unrecorded predictive-outcome conference with Deloitte and Kearney where the only mutual consensus was the likely ineligibility of all offerors for the relevant award. The Agency subsequently elected to take corrective action, terminating Kearney’s contract award for convenience, amending the solicitation to avoid issues (including undisputed issues) addressed in the GAO protest. After the Agency adopted their corrective action, the GAO protest was dismissed as academic and moot.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Marissa L. Downs, Laurie & Brennan, LLPMs. Downs may be contacted at
mdowns@lauriebrennan.com
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms TM of 2024 by Construction Executive
July 15, 2024 —
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCACS is proud to announce that it has once again been ranked among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Construction Executive 2023 rankings.
Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry, and its articles are designed to help owners and top managers run a more profitable and productive construction business.
Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 hundred U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2023 revenues from the firm’s construction practice, the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice, percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice, the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice, the year in which the construction practice was established, and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2023.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
Courthouse Reporter Series: Nebraska Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award for Misconduct
November 18, 2024 —
Brendan J. Witry - The Dispute ResolverVacating an arbitration award is often seen as an uphill battle. Indeed, the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that “courts may only vacate an arbitrator’s decision ‘only in very unusual circumstances.’” Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. 564, 568 (2013). The Federal Arbitration Act provides limited grounds to seek the vacatur of an arbitration award. In Lund-Ross Constructors v. Duke of Omaga, LLC, ___ N.W.3d ___, 33 Neb.App.73, the Nebraska Court of Appeals found that an arbitrator’s conduct warranted the partial vacatur of the award, which granted relief to a subcontractor who filed a counterclaim after the arbitration hearing had closed.
Lund-Ross contracted with Duke of Omaha to build an apartment complex in Omaha. Lund-Ross, in turn, sub-contracted with A Raymond Plumbing. Following completion of the building, Owner withheld payment from Lund-Ross, who in turn, withheld payment from Raymond. Both Lund-Ross and Raymond filed mechanics liens and initiated suits; Raymond’s suit ultimately was dismissed for want of prosecution. Lund-Ross proceeded to arbitration with Owner, naming Raymond as a respondent. Raymond did not participate in the arbitration as a claimant at the time of the hearing.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Brendan J. Witry, Laurie & Brennan LLPMr. Witry may be contacted at
bwitry@lauriebrennan.com
Bally's Secures Funding for $1.7B Chicago Casino and Hotel Project
August 12, 2024 —
Annemarie Mannion - Engineering News-RecordPlans for a $1.7-billion casino and adjacent 34-story hotel are advancing in Chicago as the gaming operator reports it has secured $940 million to complete funding for the project and has set demolition for a printing press building now occupying the site for this summer.
Reprinted courtesy of
Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com
Read the full story...
Bremer Whyte’s Newport Beach Team Prevails on a Motion for Summary Judgment in a Wrongful Death Case!
September 02, 2024 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPCongratulations on another win to Orange County Partners
Jonathan Cothran and
Rachel Mihai for prevailing on a Motion for Summary Judgment in a wrongful death case!
Plaintiffs filed a wrongful death lawsuit alleging negligence and vicarious liability against BWB&O’s client, a licensed electrical contractor. BWB&O’s client installed a solar system at the Plaintiffs’ home in January 2018. In October 2018, an electrical fire broke out at the home in an upstairs bedroom. Tragically, the family’s father perished in the fire when he entered the home after the fire started. Plaintiffs alleged that BWB&O’s client was liable for the fire and Plaintiffs’ resulting injuries due to its electrical work on the solar system at the home.
Read the full Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High CourtConstruction Defects ChecklistMontrose III: Appeals Court Rejects “Elective Vertical Stacking,” but Declines to Find “Universal Horizontal Exhaustion” Absent Proof of Policy WordingsLenders Facing Soaring Costs Shutting Out U.S. HomebuyersWendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives First Tier Ranking by U.S. News and World ReportsWhite and Williams Obtains Reversal on Appeal of $2.5 Million Verdict Against Electric Utility CompanyCongress Considers Pandemic Risk Insurance Act to Address COVID-19 Business Interruptions LossesTexas Couple Claim Many Construction Defects in HomeUpdated 3/13/20: Coronavirus is Here: What Does That Mean for Your Project and Your Business?Congratulations 2016 DE, NJ, and PA Super Lawyers and Rising StarsSpecified Or Designated Operations Endorsement – Limitation of Insurance CoverageUmbrella Policy Must Drop Down to Assist with DefenseEmployee or Independent Contractor? New Administrator’s Interpretation Issued by Department of Labor Provides GuidanceContractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case DismissedWant a Fair Chance at a Government Contract? Think AgainAsbestos Exclusion Bars CoverageInsurance Law Alert: Incorporation of Defective Work Does Not Result in Covered Property Damage in California Construction ClaimsWhere Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts CollideDIR Reminds Public Works Contractors to Renew Registrations Before January 1, 2016 to Avoid Hefty PenaltyEngineer Probing Champlain Towers Debacle Eyes Possibility of Three Successive CollapsesException to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not ApplyDamages or Injury “Likely to Occur” or “Imminent” May No Longer Trigger Insurance CoverageThink Before you Execute that Release – the Language in the Release Matters!Hawaii Federal District Court Remands Coverage DisputeDon’t Miss the 2015 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect SeminarColorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” StandardReal Case, Real Lessons: Understanding Builders’ Risk Insurance LimitsYou Are Not A “Liar” Simply Because You Amend Your ComplaintTLSS Partner Burks Smith and Associate Katie Keller Win Summary Judgment on Late Reported Water Seepage Case in South FloridaMichigan Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade, Improving from "D+" Grade in 2018California Home Sellers Have Duty to Disclose Construction Defect LawsuitsPurely “Compensatory” Debts Owed by Attorneys to Clients (Which Are Not Disciplinary or Punitive Fees Imposed by the State Bar) Are Dischargeable In BankruptcyProvidence Partner Monica R. Nelson Helps Union Carbide Secure Defense Verdict in 1st Rhode Island Asbestos Trial in Nearly 40 YearsAs Laura Wreaks Havoc Along The Gulf, Is Your Insurance Ready to Respond?A Top U.S. Seller of Carbon Offsets Starts Investigating Its Own ProjectsInsurer's Motion to Dismiss Allegations of Collapse RejectedHaight’s John Arbucci and Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2020 Southern California Rising StarsBusiness Interruption Claim Granted in Part, Denied in PartGardeners in the City of the Future: An Interview with Eric BaczukAdditional Insured Not Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Paid by Other InsurersNevada’s Changing Liability Insurance Landscape—State Insurance Regulator Issues Emergency Regulation and Guidance Addressing Controversial “Defense-Within-Limits” LegislationCourt Concludes That COVID-19 Losses Can Qualify as “Direct Physical Loss”Insurer Waives Objection to Appraiser's Partiality by Waiting Until Appraisal IssuedRDU Terminal 1: Going GreenNorfolk Southern Agrees to $310M Settlement With Feds Over 2023 Ohio DerailmentCanada’s Largest Homebuilder Sets U.S. Growth PlanFlow-Down Clauses Can Drown Your ProjectConstruction Companies Can Be Liable for “Secondary Exposure” of Asbestos to Household Members Changes To Commercial Item ContractingTo Sea or Not to Sea: Fifth Circuit Applies Maritime Law to Offshore Service Contract, Spares Indemnity Provision from Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act 
