Understanding Insurance Disputes in Construction Defect Litigation: A Review of Acuity v. Kinsale
December 17, 2024 —
David M. McLain – Colorado Construction Litigation BlogConstruction projects are inherently complex, and insurance coverage plays a crucial role in managing risks, especially when unforeseen issues arise. The case of Acuity v. Kinsale demonstrates the tangled web of insurance obligations, especially when multiple insurers provide coverage for a single event. This case, involving Monarch Stucco, Inc., Acuity, and Kinsale Insurance Company, sheds light on the challenges that contractors, subcontractors, and insurers may face when disputes over liability and coverage occur.
The Background of the Case
At the heart of this dispute lies a construction defect at a retirement community project in Lakewood, Colorado. Monarch Stucco, Inc. (“Monarch”), a subcontractor hired by GH Phipps Construction Company (“Phipps”), was responsible for stucco work on the project. Unfortunately, defects in the building’s envelope system, particularly Monarch’s stucco work, led to significant damage and costly repairs.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David M. McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCMr. McLain may be contacted at
mclain@hhmrlaw.com
Quick Note: Staying, Not Dismissing, Arbitrable Disputes Under Federal Arbitration Act
July 31, 2024 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesAs you hopefully know from posted articles, arbitration is a creature of contract. Stated differently, there must be a contractual basis to have a dispute resolved through binding arbitration. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) applies to transactions involving interstate commerce. Oftentimes, lawsuits are filed despite an arbitration provision in a contract because parties can, if they desire, waive their rights to have their dispute resolved through binding arbitration.
In what should not be a shocker, the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. Spizzirri, 144 S.Ct. 1173, 1178 (2024), held that when a federal “district court finds that a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute, and a party requests a stay pending arbitration, section 3 of the FAA compels the court to stay the proceeding.” Dismissing the lawsuit should not be the option. Staying the lawsuit should.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Deadline Nears for “Green Performance Bond” Implementation
December 03, 2024 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsFor this weeks Guest Post Friday at Musings, we welcome Surety Bonds.com, a leading online surety provider. SuretyBonds.com specializes in educating current and prospective business owners about local surety requirements. To keep up with surety bond trends, follow and Surety Bonds Insider blog and @suretybond on Twitter.
Professionals who work in the construction industry know the laws that regulate the market change constantly. Unfortunately, even government agencies are flawed, which means they sometimes establish nonsensical, arbitrary regulations that leave construction professionals even more confused as to how they’re expected to do their jobs.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Providence Partner Monica R. Nelson Helps Union Carbide Secure Defense Verdict in 1st Rhode Island Asbestos Trial in Nearly 40 Years
December 31, 2024 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomProvidence, R.I. (November 22, 2024) - On November 21, 2024, a Providence County jury returned a unanimous defense verdict for Union Carbide Corporation after a nine-day trial presided over by Associate Justice Richard A. Licht. Tim McGowan of Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli Hanna & Reber LLP, Eric Cook of Willcox Savage, and Monica R. Nelson of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP represented Union Carbide at trial. Elliott Davis of Shook Hardy & Bacon was Union Carbide’s appellate counsel.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers, Vincent L. Greene IV, Nathan D. Finch, and Ashley Hornstein of Motley Rice LLC, represented the family of Mrs. Bonnie Bonito in the first asbestos matter to go to trial in Rhode Island in close to 40 years and requested nearly $25 million in compensatory damages for the death of Mrs. Bonito from her alleged exposure to Union Carbide’s asbestos, among many other asbestos-containing products, through the work clothes of her husband. The plaintiffs’ proffered theory of liability against Union Carbide Corporation is known as a “take-home” exposure claim.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
New York Appellate Team Obtains Affirmance of Dismissal of Would-Be Labor Law Action Against Municipal Entities
August 12, 2024 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomNew York, N.Y. (July 11, 2024) - In Charlot v. City of New York, ___ A.D.3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 03161 (2d Dep’t 2024), New York Associate Dean Pillarella, a member of the Appellate Practice, recently obtained an affirmance of the lower court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s action against the City of New York (“the City”) for failure to timely serve a notice of claim. New York Partner Meghan Cavalieri, a member of the Construction Practice, and her team authored and argued the initial motion to dismiss.
The plaintiff alleged to have sustained injuries as a result of a construction-site accident on December 8, 2020, on City-owned property in the course of the construction of a school by the New York City School Construction Authority. N.Y. General Municipal Law (“GML”) § 50-e(1)(a), requires service of a notice of claim within 90 days after the claim arises as a condition precedent to the commencement of a tort action. The plaintiff served no notice of claim until June 2021 and commenced an action in January 2022, alleging violations of N.Y. Labor Law §§ 240(1), 241(6), and 200. Given the plaintiff’s failure to comply with GML § 50-e(1)(a), Meghan and her team rejected the notices of claim as untimely. The plaintiff then moved for leave to deem the notices of claim timely served nunc pro tunc. In response, Meghan and her team opposed the motion and cross-moved to dismiss the action.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable
November 05, 2024 —
Bill Wilson - Construction Law ZoneDispute resolution provisions that grant one party the unilateral right to choose either litigation or arbitration to resolve disputes are common in the construction industry. The main difference between the two forums is that courts are more likely to strictly enforce contract terms as written as well as the applicable law, while arbitrators make decisions on more equitable considerations, untethered to the contract terms and—to some degree—the law. The party with the sole discretion to select the dispute resolution procedure can select the process most beneficial to its interests based on the nature of the dispute, regardless of who brings the claims. In Atlas Electrical Construction, Inc. v. Flintco, LLC, 550 P.3d 881 (N.M. Ct. App. 2024), the Court of Appeals of New Mexico recently held that an arbitration provision in a subcontract, under which the contractor retained the exclusive right to choose whether disputes arising under the subcontract were litigated in court or arbitrated was unreasonably one-sided, substantively unconscionable, and unenforceable.
The Atlas Electrical case involved two sophisticated entities with equal bargaining strength to negotiate the terms of a subcontract. The parties agreed to a subcontract provision which provided in the relevant part:
In the event [contractor] and [subcontractor] cannot resolve the dispute through direct discussions or mediation … then the dispute shall, at the sole discretion of [contractor], be decided either by submission to (a) arbitration … or (b) litigation …
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bill Wilson, Robinson & Cole LLPMr. Wilson may be contacted at
wwilson@rc.com
Texas Allows Wide Scope for Certificate of Merit
January 07, 2025 —
Lian Skaf - The Subrogation StrategistThe purpose of certificate of merit (sometimes referred to as affidavit of merit) statutes is to identify frivolous claims before the court wastes time and resources during litigation. More common in medical malpractice cases, several states have enacted similar requirements for professional negligence claims dealing with construction-related issues. While a subrogation attorney should not be bringing a frivolous case to suit anyway, the requirement adds another step in the process that plaintiffs need to properly navigate.
Chapter 150 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code requires that in an action arising out of professional services by a licensed or registered professional, claimants must file an affidavit from a qualified expert attesting to the theories of recovery, the negligence and the factual basis for the claims. The expert must be competent, have the same professional license or registration as the defendant and practice in the area of practice of the defendant.
In Janis Smith Consulting, LLC v. Rosenberg, No. 03-23-00370-CV, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 7961, the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District (Court of Appeals) addressed a challenge from the defendant as to the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s certificate of merit in an interlocutory appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the allegedly improper certificate of merit, holding that the plaintiff’s expert was sufficiently qualified to certify the legitimacy of the case.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lian Skaf, White and Williams LLPMr. Skaf may be contacted at
skafl@whiteandwilliams.com
Kahana Feld Receives 2024 OCCDL Top Legal Organizations for DEI Award
September 30, 2024 —
Linda Carter - Kahana FeldIRVINE, CA – Sep. 12, 2024 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that the firm received the 2024 Top Legal Organizations for DEI Award from the Orange County Coalition for Diversity in the Law (OCCDL). The firm will be recognized at an awards gala at The Westin South Coast Plaza on October 3.
Each year, the OCCDL recognizes individuals and organizations who have advanced diversity, equity, and inclusion in the Orange County legal community, whether through their excellence in the law or their direct efforts to promote DEI. Kahana Feld was recognized for programs such as its DEI book club and its regular webinars on topics like implicit bias. The firm supports various DEI organizations and initiatives in the Orange County area, including the Orange County Asian American Bar Association, the Orange County Women Lawyers As
Contractor Gets Benched After Failing to Pay Jury FeesNo Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer“To Indemnify, or Not to Indemnify, that is the Question: California Court of Appeal Addresses Active Negligence in Indemnity Provisions”Taking Service Network Planning to the Next LevelVermont Supreme Court Reverses, Finding No Coverage for CollapseNarberth Mayor Urges Dubious Legal ActionDeterioration of Bridge Infrastructure Is Increasing Insurance NeedsBest Lawyers® Recognizes 37 White And Williams LawyersSales Pickup Shows Healing U.S. Real Estate MarketAmendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – Expert TestimonyRecovering Time and Costs from Hurricane Helene: Force Majeure Solutions for ContractorsRepairs to Hurricane-damaged Sanibel Causeway Completed in 105 DaysNew Standard Addresses Wind Turbine Construction Safety Requirements and Identifies HazardsWhen an Insurer Proceeds as Subrogee, Defendants Should Not Assert Counterclaims Against the Insured/SubrogorPollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From RoofContractor Sues Yelp Reviewer for DefamationFlorida Construction Defect Decision Part of Lengthy EvolutionContractor Given a Wake-Up Call for Using a "Sham" RMO/RME"My Bad, I Thought It Was in Good Faith" is Not Good Enough - Contractor Ordered to Pay Prompt Payment PenaltiesMichael Baker Intl. Settles Federal Pay Bias AllegationsBad News for Buyers: U.S. Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Since 2014California Court of Appeal Holds That the Right to Repair Act Prohibits Class Actions Against Manufacturers of Products Completely Manufactured OffsiteNew Defendant Added to Morrison Bridge Decking LawsuitThere's No Place Like HomeMcDermott International and BP Team Arbitrate $535M LNG Site DisputeIvanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, TerminalIn a Win for Design Professionals, California Court of Appeals Holds That Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Certificate of Merit LawDiffering Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains UnclearEngineer Pauses Fix of 'Sinking' Millennium Tower in San FranciscoKeeping Detailed Records: The Best Defense to Constructive EvictionSolar Power Inc. to Build 30-Megawatt Project in Inner MongoliaProtect Your Right To Payment By Following NeddA Look at Business and Professions Code Section 7031Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/17/24) – Housing Inflation to Remain High, Proptech Investment to Fall and Office Vacancy Rates to Reach Peak in 2025Defending Against the Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine – Liability Considerations43% of U.S. Homes in High Natural Disaster Risk AreasCanadian Developer Faces Charges After Massive Fire on Construction SiteHomebuilders Opposed to Potential Change to Interest on Construction Defect ExpensesChoice of Law Provisions in Construction ContractsWith VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)Embattled SNC-Lavalin Files Ethics Appeal, Realigns StructureHow Well Do You Know the 2012 IECC Code?Congratulations Bryan Stofferahn, August Hotchkin, and Eileen Gaisford on Their Promotion to Partner!Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?California Statutes Authorizing Public-Private Partnership ContractingNevada Legislature Burns Insurers' Rights to Offer Eroding LimitsSouth Carolina Supreme Court Asked Whether Attorney-Client Privilege Waived When Insurer Denies Bad FaithNew York Assembly Reconsiders ‘Bad Faith’ BillConstruction Industry Survey Says Optimism Hits All-Time HighCo-Housing Startups Fly in the Face of Old-School NYC Housing LawMediating is Eye OpeningTop 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Fall Forum Meeting in PittsburghBreak out the Neon: ‘80s Era Davis-Bacon “Prevailing Wage” Definition Restored in DOL Final RuleNo Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Where Underlying Claim is Strictly Breach of ContractWells Fargo, JPMorgan Vexed by Low Demand for MortgagesConstructive Notice Established as Obstacle to Relation Back DoctrineNew Evidence Code Requires Attorney to Obtain Written Acknowledgement that the Confidential Nature of Mediation has been Disclosed to the Client 
