Choice of Law Provisions in Construction Contracts
October 07, 2024 —
Victoria Davies - ConsensusDocsIf you have used a ConsensusDocs® construction agreement or another industry association construction agreement for one of your projects, you are accustomed to seeing the laws of the state where the construction project is located as the governing law. There are good reasons for the laws of the state where the project is located to govern the construction agreement for the project. Even if not headquartered in the state, the parties have a presence there by virtue of their participation in the project in the state. Personnel and records that may be needed to resolve a claim may be located in the state. If there are experts that need to be engaged, they will likely need to visit the site. These reasons of efficiency and convenience, alone, may justify the parties’ decision to select the project state’s laws to govern their construction contract. However, there is also the policy interest of the project state, whose laws may even mandate that the project state’s laws govern construction contracts for in-state projects and that the parties resolve their disputes in state as well.
Several states have laws that require construction disputes for projects in the state to be resolved under its laws and/or litigated or arbitrated in the state. Some states require only that its laws govern and do not also require that the dispute resolution take place in the state, but some require both – that its laws govern and the disputes be resolved there. There may be different triggers as to when the statute applies. For example, in some states, the statute applies to any construction contract for a project in the state. In others, the law may only be triggered if one of the parties is domiciled in the state.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Victoria Davies, Jones Walker LLPMs. Davies may be contacted at
vdavies@joneswalker.com
Attorneys’ Fees and the American Arbitration Association Rule
September 09, 2024 —
Bill Wilson - Construction Law ZoneA common question from clients, when a dispute arises on a construction project, is whether they can recover their attorney’s fees from the other side if they pursue a case and win. More often than not, such fees are not recoverable. As a general rule (commonly known as the “American Rule”), each party to a dispute must bear their own attorney’s fees unless there is some statutory provision or contractual agreement between the parties allowing otherwise. Since most construction disputes involve claims for breach of contract and/or negligence, no realistic statutory provision often allows for attorney’s fees. Many construction contracts do not typically provide a prevailing party the right to collect attorney’s fees from the other side. However, even if the American Rule applies, there may be another path to recovering attorney’s fees if the parties agree to arbitrate their dispute under the American Arbitration Association (AAA) rules.
Reprinted courtesy of
Bill Wilson, Robinson & Cole LLP
Mr. Wilson may be contacted at wwilson@rc.com
Read the full story...
Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Fall Forum Meeting in Pittsburgh
December 03, 2024 —
Marissa L. Downs - The Dispute ResolverOver 500 construction law attorneys and consultants convened last week at the confluence of three rivers in what became the first-ever meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania of the ABA Forum on Construction Law. The Steel City was a fitting backdrop for a meeting focused on issues of design in construction. Thanks to the hard work of many, most notably the newly minted Forum Chair Keith Bergeron and Meeting Coordinators Kendall Woods and Michael Clark, the meeting's attendees brought home new connections and a host of new lessons learned. Read on for my top 10 take-aways from the 2024 Fall Meeting in Pittsburgh and feel free to share yours in the comments below.
10. An architect's standard of care does not require perfection. A common refrain across many of the meeting's plenary sessions was that any design that is produced by human hands will never be perfect. In recognition of our own fallibility, the legal standard to which design professionals will be held to account does not require that their designs be error-free. A design professional must generally exercise the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals performing similar services under similar circumstances. Establishing what that means in each locality will vary and will most likely need to be supported by the expert opinion of another practicing design professional.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Marissa L. Downs, Laurie & Brennan, LLPMs. Downs may be contacted at
mdowns@lauriebrennan.com
A Game of Texas Hold’em: How Texas Stopped Wage Increases for Salaried Exempt Employees Nationwide
December 03, 2024 —
Matthew DeVries - Best Practices Construction LawConstruction contractors often have to deal with classification of employees, particularly those who work in the home office. Today’s guest post by
Alexandra Shulman and
Leah Lively addresses a recent court decision affecting the wage protection of employees under the the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
On November 15, 2024, a federal court in Texas vacated a U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) rule (the “2024 Rule”) that increased the minimum salary threshold for employees classified as exempt from overtime and minimum wage protections under the FLSA. The Texas court’s decision nullifies the 2024 Rule nationwide, effective immediately.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Matthew DeVries, BuchalterMr. DeVries may be contacted at
mdevries@buchalter.com
Parks and Degradation: The Mess at Yosemite
September 09, 2024 —
Laura Bliss - BloombergA couple of miles past the western entrance to Yosemite National Park, visitors pass from California into a postcard. The road opens to a majestic view of
Half Dome, El Capitan and Cathedral Rocks—celebrity peaks if ever there were—which form the towering walls of Yosemite Valley. On the pine-scented floor of John Muir’s mountain mansion, the Merced River flows gently by the side of the road as signs point toward trailheads and tourist destinations. Not far from
Curry Village, a cluster of tent cabins and eateries at the eastern end of the road, is a section of employee housing known as the Stables. It was there that Erin Rau found herself wrapped in a sleeping bag one broiling afternoon last summer, wondering whether she was about to die.
Rau was a little over a month into a seasonal job selling goods in the village’s general store. Almost as soon as she arrived from Michigan, she recalls, she got the sense this wouldn’t be the carefree, post-college summer gig she’d imagined. In the evenings, she was left alone to manage a bunch of fellow early-twentysomethings making the same sixteenish bucks an hour until the shop closed at 10. At night a family of ringtail possums would crawl down from the rafters to tear into a display of baked goods, a long-standing issue she says her bosses did nothing to resolve, apart from throwing away half-eaten muffins in the morning. Similarly, deer mice kept leaving droppings on the pillows and sheets in the cabin Rau shared with three other women. When one of her roommates complained, she says, management supplied a Ziploc with a couple of mouse traps, a mask, gloves and some hand wipes, leaving the employees to sort out the rest.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Laura Bliss, Bloomberg
Seattle Developer Defaults on Renovated Office Buildings
December 23, 2024 —
Anna Edgerton - BloombergA major developer in downtown Seattle defaulted on a loan backed by two of its most prized office properties, including one that formerly housed a branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Firms tied to Martin Selig Real Estate are in default on a more than $200 million loan, according to letters from lender Acore Capital dated Nov. 15 that were filed in Washington’s King County. The buildings would change ownership 30 days after that notice if no other action is taken, according to the letters.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Anna Edgerton, Bloomberg
Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court
July 31, 2024 —
Erica Whaley - Construction Law ZoneEarlier this year, the
Associated Subcontractors of Massachusetts hired Robinson+Cole attorney
Joseph Barra to submit an amicus brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for consideration in the appeal pending before it in
Business Interiors Floor Covering Business Trust v. Graycor Construction Co., Inc. In its June 17, 2024 decision in that case, the Court interpreted the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act, which applies to private construction projects and “requires that parties to a construction contract approve or reject payment within” an allotted time period and in compliance with certain procedures else such payments will be deemed approved. Two years ago, the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in
Tocci Building Corp. v. IRIV Partners, LLC, decided that an owner who fails to timely advise its general contractor of the reasons as to why it was withholding payment, coupled with failure to certify that such funds are being withheld in good faith, violates the Prompt Pay Act and makes the owner liable for funds owed.
[1] However, the Tocci Building Court left open the question of whether one who violates the Prompt Pay Act forfeits its substantive defenses to non-payment, such as fraud, defective work, or breach of material obligation of the contract.
The facts of Business Interiors involve a general contractor, Graycor, which subcontracted Business Interiors to perform certain flooring work for a movie theatre in Boston’s North End. When Graycor failed to formally approve, reject, or certify, in good faith, its withholding of payment of three of Business Interiors’ applications for payment as prescribed by the Prompt Pay Act, Business Interiors brought suit alleging, among other things, breach of contract. Business Interiors then moved for summary judgement arguing that Graycor’s failure to comply with the Act rendered it liable for the unpaid invoices.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Robinson + Cole
Federal Court Holds that Demolition Exclusion Does Not Apply and Carrier Has Duty to Defend Additional Insureds
September 02, 2024 —
Craig Rokuson - Traub LiebermanIn the recent case of
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Trisura Specialty Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101953 (S.D.N.Y. June 7, 2024), the court had occasion to consider the classic additional insured fact pattern of a construction accident. Travelers insured the general contractor and provided a defense to the general contractor as well as its wholly owned subsidiary. Trisura insured the subcontractor, who employed the injured worker. Travelers brought suit, alleging that Trisura is obligated to defend and indemnify the general contractor, its subsidiary, the owner of the building (The City of New York), and the tenant.
Trisura denied any obligation to provide coverage due to the application of the “Demolition Exclusion” to the Trisura policy, which provides, in part, that there is no coverage for injury or damage arising out of the demolition of any building or structure which has original ground height in excess of three stories. The accident occurred during the interior demolition of
The Right to Repair Act (Civ.C §895 et seq.) Applies and is the Exclusive Remedy for a Homeowner Alleging Construction DefectsReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/11/22)BOOK CLUB SERIES: Everything You Want to Know About Construction Arbitration But Were Afraid to AskKeep Your Construction Claims Alive in Crazy Economic TimesEndorsements Preclude Coverage for Alleged Faulty WorkmanshipContinuity and Disaster Recovery Plans for Contractors: Lessons From the PastThe Dog Ate My Exclusion! – Georgia Federal Court: No Reformation to Add Pollution ExclusionYou Cannot Arbitrate Claims Not Covered By The Arbitration AgreementPre-Suit Settlement Offers and Construction Lien ActionsSE 2050 Is In Quixotic Pursuit of Eliminating Embodied Carbon in Building StructuresNew York Team Secures Appellate Win on Behalf of National Home Improvement ChainFaulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar CoverageJapan Quake Triggers Landslides, Knocks Power Plant OfflineTen Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to the Best Lawyers in America© 2019When Must a New York Insurer Turn Over a Copy of the Policy?Bidder Be Thoughtful: The Impacts of Disclaimers in Pre-Bid ReportsCreating a Custom Home Feature in the Great OutdoorsConstruction Defect Claim over LAX RunwaysCOVID-19 Response: Executive Order 13999: Enhancement of COVID-19-Related Workplace Safety RequirementsCDJ’s #5 Topic of the Year: Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, et al.Homeowner's Claim for Collapse Survives Summary JudgmentIs Your Construction Business Feeling the Effects of the Final DBA Rule?California Supreme Court Allows Claim Under Unfair Competition Statute To ProceedDesigners Face Fatal Pedestrian Bridge Collapse FalloutConstruction Defect Claim Must Be Defended Under Florida LawStorm Eunice Damage in U.K. Could Top £300 MillionMeasure of Damages in Negligent Procurement of Surety Bonds / InsuranceAmerica’s Factories Weren’t Built to Endure This Many HurricanesVinny Testaverde Alleges $5 Million Mansion Riddled with DefectsArchitect Norman Foster Tells COP26: Change 'Traditional' City Design to Combat Climate ChangeReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/24/24) – Omni Hotels Hit with Cyberattack, Wisconsin’s Low-Interest Loans for Home Construction, and Luxury Real Estate Sales IncreaseMGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon TowersIndemnification Provisions Do Not Create Reciprocal Attorney’s Fees ProvisionsPartner Denis Moriarty and Of Counsel William Baumgaertner Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2017California Cracking down on Phony QualifiersNYC-N.J. Gateway Rail-Tunnel Work May Start in 20232011 Worst Year Ever for Home SalesConsequential Damage Claims for Insurer's Bad Faith DismissedConnecting IoT Data to BIMReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/2/24) – Increase in Commercial Property Vacancy Rates, Trouble for the Real Estate Market and Real Estate as a Long-Term InvestmentSubstantial Completion Explained: What Contractors & Owners Should KnowDon’t Be Lazy with Your TendersNeighbor Allowed to Remove Tree Roots on Her Property That Supported Adjoining Landowners’ Two Large Trees With Legal ImmunityFifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of InsuredU.S. Stocks Fall as Small Shares Tumble Amid Home SalesConstruction of World's Tallest Building to Resume With New $1.9B Contract for Jeddah TowerWhen is a “Willful” Violation Willful (or Not) Under California’s Contractor Enforcement Statutes?Preparing For and Avoiding Residential Construction Disputes: For Homeowners and ContractorsArchitect Searches for Lost Identity in a City Ravaged by WarLakewood First City in Colorado to Pass Ordinance Limiting State Construction Defect Law 
