Arizona Court Affirms Homeowners’ Association’s Right to Sue Over Construction Defects
October 15, 2024 —
Melissa Kenney - White and Williams LLPIn Gallery Community Association v. K. Hovnanian at Gallery LLC, No. 1 CA-CV 23-0375, 2024 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 696 (Ct. App.), the Court of Appeals of Arizona (Court of Appeals) discussed whether a homeowners’ association can file an action for breach of the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability arising from construction defects. At issue was whether the implied warranty extended to the areas within the community that the association maintained, including the common areas. The Court of Appeals held that homeowners’ associations can sue builder-vendors for breach of the implied warranty arising from construction defects.
In this case, a homeowners’ association, responsible for managing and maintaining a community of townhomes, sued the developer/builder for alleged construction defects in the common area and exteriors of homes that the association maintained for the homeowners in the community. The alleged defects included the pool cabana and staircase walls in the common areas and the exterior walls, roofs, and staircases on the separately owned townhomes in the community. The builder filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the implied warranty extended to dwelling actions initiated by homeowners – not homeowners’ associations – and that the alleged construction defects at issue were not related to a dwelling. The trial court granted the motion. The Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings. In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals determined that both common law and statutory law authorized the homeowners’ association’s breach of implied warranty claim.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Melissa Kenney, White and WilliamsMs. Kenney may be contacted at
kenneyme@whiteandwilliams.com
Executive Insights 2024: Leaders in Construction Law
August 05, 2024 —
Construction ExecutiveThe key risks that should always be taken into account when a contract is signed are risks associated with uncompensated delays and cost increases. Provisions relating to the scope of work deserve significant attention to help minimize these risks. Defining the scope of work is often put on the backburner while parties focus on negotiating the rest of the terms and conditions of the contract. And when these scopes are inserted, they are often not closely reviewed by attorneys who tend to defer to project personnel on scope. These situations can lead to costly disputes.
Instead, make sure: (1) the correct plans and specifications have been referenced in the contract; (2) an attorney or his/her business counterpart is familiar with relevant specifications; (3) the exhibit containing the assumptions and clarifications is clearly written, has been coordinated with language in the body of the contract and can be clearly understood by attorneys and business people beyond the preconstruction personnel who drafted them; and (4) the contract addresses the order of precedence in the event of a conflict between or among contract provisions (including exhibits). With regard to specifications referenced above, an attorney review is advised because many specification sections, including submittal sections, change order sections, payment provisions and construction progress documentation sections, regularly vary from the negotiated sections of the actual contract. Contractors also unwittingly accept design risk through performance specifications, and the accompanying obligations and risks are underestimated by those tasked with the initial review of those documents. In sum, a clear scope is as important as clear terms and conditions.
Reprinted courtesy of
Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
What Every Project Participant Needs to Know About Delay Claims
August 05, 2024 —
Andrew G. Vicknair - The Dispute ResolverA “delay” on a construction project is defined as the stretching out of the time for completion of certain key milestone scopes of work which can impact the completion date of an entire project, due to some circumstances or events that were not reasonably anticipated when the project began. 2 Construction Law ¶ 6.01 (Matthew Bender, 2024). While delays can be caused by any number of events, the most common are defective plans and specifications; design changes; severe weather and other, similar unforeseeable events; unforeseen or differing site conditions; unavailability of materials or labor; labor inefficiencies or stoppages; contractor negligence; and owner influences, including construction changes or outright interference by the owner or its agents. If the project schedule is not recovered following a delay, then the project schedule will likely be extended, resulting in an increase in the contractor’s costs of performance. A contractor that has experienced a delay on a project can take certain actions to pursue recovery of any damages the contractor may have incurred. However, to do so it is important to understand the different types of delays and the methods for establishing the delays.
I. Types of Delays
Delays may be categorized as (1) critical versus non-critical delays, (2) excusable versus non-excusable delays, and (3) compensable versus non-compensable delays. A critical delay is a delay that affects the project completion date and delays the entire project. In essence, a critical delay is one that will extend the critical path of a project. A non-critical delay is a delay that has no effect on the project’s critical path. Courts have recognized that delays to work not on the critical path will generally not delay the completion of a project. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v U.S., 5 Cl. Ct. 662, 728 (1984). Such a non-critical delay may affect the completion of certain activities, but does not affect the completion date of the entire project. In order for a delay to provide the basis for a claim for additional time or money, the delay must impact critical path activities on the project schedule.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Andrew G. Vicknair, D'Arcy Vicknair, LLCMr. Vicknair may be contacted at
agv@darcyvicknair.com
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/1/24) – Hybrid Work Technologies, AI in Construction and the Market for Office Buildings
November 05, 2024 —
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogIn our latest roundup, commercial mortgage bond market in trouble, commercial real estate investments, pressure on mortgage REITs, and more!
- Short-term issues facing U.S. commercial real estate have made it an investment opportunity and values have bottomed out. (CNBC)
- As organizations report plans to shake up their real estate portfolios, the flight to quality spurs interest in space planning, amenities and hybrid work technologies. (Joe Burns, Facilities Dive)
- The conversation about AI’s potential benefits and risks has been a common refrain in construction recently. (Matthew Thibault, Construction Dive)
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team
Climate Disasters Are an Affordable Housing Problem
October 01, 2024 —
Juan Pablo Garnham & Arjuna Heim - BloombergWhen Maui was devastated by wildfires in August 2023, some residents were initially fortunate. The neighborhood of Makawao, for example, was spared the worst effects of the fire that engulfed Lahaina, 35 miles to the west.
Recently, though, we met a woman in that neighborhood who faces a different kind of threat: Her landlord has now demanded that she pay double her rent or face eviction. As housing advocates in the region, we’ve heard stories like this repeatedly, as residents report an acute fear of displacement and homelessness.
A year after the fires killed more than 100 people, displaced 12,000 and disrupted the economy of the island, the disaster lingers for many in Maui and Hawai'i. Rents across the island have increased sharply, offering a cautionary tale for the rest of the US about how climate change, a housing crisis and the lack of adequate public policies can multiply the suffering of a community already in pain.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bloomberg
Why Should Businesses Seek Legal Help Early On?
December 03, 2024 —
Scott L. Baker - Los Angeles Litigation BlogMost business owners are natural problem solvers. They assess the issue that lies before them and develop a strategy to overcome it. It’s a critical mindset to have, but do all business owners have the skillset to solve every issue?
While it is understandable that business owners may want to attempt to resolve issues on their own, it is invariably beneficial to obtain guidance for legal issues earlier rather than later.
3 Reasons to Consult an Attorney Sooner than Later
Many people might consider working with an attorney to be a last resort. Typically, this is not the case; rather, getting knowledgeable legal counsel sooner than later can help business owners because:
- It’s Cheaper: Early legal intervention can often prevent disputes from leading to litigation, which can be expensive. Working with an attorney to resolve a conflict before it escalates into a larger issue is often a good business decision and wise investment.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Scott L. Baker, Baker & AssociatesMr. Baker may be contacted at
slb@bakerslaw.com
Insurers' Motion to Determine Lack of Occurrence Fails
August 19, 2024 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court, interpreting Massachusetts law, found there were genuine issues of fact as to whether the insured's mixing of biodiesel with home heating fuel was an occurrence. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Peterson's Oil Serv., Inc., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106980 (D. Mass. June 17, 2024).
Homeowners sued Peterson's Oil Service, alleging that Peterson sold them fuel for home heating which contained more that 5% biodiesel. The homeowners further alleged that fuel containing more than 5% biodiesel did not meet industry standards and caued damage to their home heating equipment. Peterson allegedly did not fully disclose the presence of biodiesel in their fuel, despite knowing the risk posed by high-biodiesel blended fuel.
The insurers, United States Fire Insurance Company and The North River Insurance Company, defended Peterson under a reservation of rights. United Sta
Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty ClaimsNo Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?How Concrete Mistakes Added Cost to the Recent Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge ProjectGRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA DisputeKumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo MoverTopic 606: A Retrospective Review of Revenue from Contracts with Customers2017 California Employment Law UpdateMaking the Construction Dispute Resolution Process More Efficient and Less Expensive, Part 2In Contracts, One Word Makes All the DifferenceSales of U.S. Existing Homes Rise to One-Year HighDOE Abruptly Cancels $13B Cleanup Award to BWXT-Fluor TeamPennsylvania Supreme Court’s Ruling On Certificates Of Merit And “Gist Of Action” May Make It More Difficult For An Architect Or Engineer To Seek An Early DismissalU.S. Supreme Court Halts Enforcement of the OSHA Vaccine or Test MandateFederal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New JerseyJury Finds Broker Liable for Policyholder’s Insufficient Business Interruption LimitsOrdinary Use of Term In Insurance Policy PrevailedUnderstanding Lien WaiversMillion-Dollar Home Sales Thrive While Low End StumblesInsurers' Motion to Void Coverage for Failure to Attend EUO DeniedSpeculative Luxury Homebuilding on the RiseWill Millennial’s Desire for Efficient Spaces Kill the McMansion?Cont
Insurer Not Responsible for Insured's Assignment of Policy Benefits
California Supreme Court Addresses “Good Faith” Construction Disputes Under Prompt Payment Laws
Contractors Battle Bitter Winters at $11.8B Site C Hydro Project in Canada
Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (01/11/23) – Construction Tech, Housing Market Confidence, and Decarbonization
The Jersey Shore gets Beach Prisms Designed to Reduce Erosion
Uneven Code Enforcement Seen in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings in Turkey
Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case
Are Construction Defect Laws Inhibiting the Development of Attached Ownership Housing in Colorado?
Builders Can’t Rely on SB800
Busting Major Alternative-Lending Myths
Texas Couple Claim Many Construction Defects in Home
Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in 2019 Edition of Who’s Who Legal
Labor Shortage Confirmed Through AGC Poll
Insurers in New Jersey Secure a Victory on Water Damage Claims, But How Big a Victory Likely Remains to be Seen
Were Quake Standards Illegally Altered for PG&E Nuclear Power Plant?
Yes, Virginia, Contract Terms Do Matter: Financing Term Offers Owner an Escape Hatch
Constructive Suspension (Suspension Outside of an Express Order)
The Prolonged Effects on Commercial Property From Extreme Weather
Nevada Update: Nevada Commissioner of Insurance Updates Burning Limits Statute with Emergency Regulation
Congratulations to Partner Nicole Whyte on Receiving the Marcus M. Kaufman Jurisprudence Award
Savannah Homeowners Win Sizable Judgment in Mold Case against HVAC Contractor
Design-Assist Collaboration/Follow-up Post
Trump Signs $2-Trillion Stimulus Bill for COVID-19 Emergency
How to Fix America
Beyond Inverse Condemnation in Wildfire Litigation: An Oregon Jury Finds Utility Liable for Negligence, Trespass and Nuisance
David M. McLain named Law Week Colorado’s 2015 Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants
California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction
BWB&O Partner Tyler Offenhauser and Associate Lizbeth Lopez Won Their Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Privette Doctrine
Landlord Duties of Repair and Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment
Homeowner Alleges Pool Construction Is Defective
Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims
Hundreds of Coronavirus Coverage Cases Await Determination on Consolidation
Florida Condos Bet on Americans Making 50% Down Payments
Monumental Museum Makeover Comes In For Landing
11th Circuit Affirms Bad Faith Judgement Against Primary Insurer
Private Statutory Cause of Action Under Florida’s Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act
Toll Brothers Faces Construction Defect Lawsuit in New Jersey
The Condo Conundrum: 10 Reasons Why There's a 'For Sale' Shortage in Seattle
Why Construction Firms Should Think Differently on the Issue of Sustainability
Construction Up in United States
August Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Appreciate at Faster Pace
Fraud, the VCPA and Construction Contracts
What You Need to Know About “Ipso Facto” Clauses and Their Impact on Termination of a Contractor or Subcontractor in a Bankruptcy
Finalists in San Diego’s Moving Parklet Design Competition Announced
Review of Recent Contractors State License Board Changes
Mass-Timber Furnished Apartments Fare Well in Fire Tests
Performance Bond Primer: Need to Knows and Need to Dos
Ahlers, Cressman & Sleight PLLC Ranked Top Washington Law Firm By Construction Executive
ABC Chapter President Comments on Miami Condo Collapse
New York Climate Mobilization Act Update: Reducing Carbon Emissions and Funding Solutions
