Snooze You Lose? Enforcement of Notice and Timing Provisions
November 11, 2024 —
Cornelius F. "Lee" Banta, Jr. - ConsensusDocsDeadlines are an inescapable part of the construction industry. Bid deadlines. Submittal deadlines. Material delivery deadlines. Substantial completion. Final completion. And so, inevitably, fighting about deadlines becomes a necessary byproduct. Was the deadline really a deadline? Was the schedule slippage on the critical path? Should there be an equitable extension to the date of substantial completion? Given the amount of attention and concern conferred on deadlines, those drafting construction contracts naturally seek to clarify which deadlines really matter with the inclusion of notice and timing provisions.
A contract’s change order and claims procedures are often a key friction point for those drafting and administering the contract. Should there be a requirement for prior written notice of a claim for cost/time relief? How much advance notice? Who should the request be sent to? Is a specific form of notice required? What are the consequences of failing to provide timely notice? A practitioner should pay careful attention to negotiating these terms on the front end, because rest assured, these contract provisions will garner scrutiny when a change order dispute boils over.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Cornelius F. "Lee" Banta, Jr., Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Banta may be contacted at
lbanta@pecklaw.com
Not a Waiver for All: Maryland Declines to Apply Subrogation Waiver to Subcontractors
September 23, 2024 —
Gus Sara - The Subrogation StrategistIn Lithko Contr., LLC v. XL Ins. Am. Inc., No. 31, Sept. Term, 2023, 2024 Md. LEXIS 256, the Supreme Court of Maryland considered whether a tenant who contracted for the construction of a large warehouse facility waived its insurer’s rights to subrogation against subcontractors when it agreed to waive subrogation against the general contractor. The court ultimately decided that the unambiguous language of the subrogation waiver in the development agreement between the parties did not extend to subcontractors. The court also held that the tenant’s requirement that subcontracts include a subrogation waiver did not, in this case, impose a project-wide waiver on all parties. The court, however, found that the requirement that the subcontracts include a similar, but not identical, waiver provision rendered the subcontract’s waiver clauses ambiguous and remanded the case to the lower court to determine if the parties to the development agreement – i.e., Duke Baltimore LLC (“Duke”) and Amazon.com.dedc, LLC (“Amazon”) – intended that the waiver clause in the subcontracts covered claims against subcontractors.
This case involved roof and structural damage to a warehouse in Baltimore, Maryland that Duke owned. In March 2014, Amazon entered into a development agreement with Duke for the construction of the warehouse. Amazon also agreed to subsequently lease the warehouse from Duke. Although Amazon essentially owned and/or developed the project, the development agreement identified Duke as “Landlord” and Amazon as “Tenant.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gus Sara, White and WilliamsMr. Sara may be contacted at
sarag@whiteandwilliams.com
Preserving Lien Rights on Private Projects in Washington: Three Common Mistakes to Avoid
September 16, 2024 —
Kristina Southwell - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCThe Washington Construction Lien Statute, RCW 60.04 et seq., exists to help secure payment for work performed for the improvement of real property.[
1] The statute grants “any person furnishing labor, professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of real property” the authority to claim “a lien upon the improvement for the contract price of labor, professional services, materials, or equipment furnished.” RCW 60.04.021.
Exercising lien rights is one of the most useful tools available to a contractor or supplier trying to recover payment owed on a project. A properly recorded lien binds the project property, which is typically the most valuable asset held by the owner, as security for the amounts owed to the lien claimant. Additionally, the lien statute provides a basis for the claimant to recover the costs of recording the lien and its attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in litigating the foreclosure of the lien.
While the lien statute authorizes the right to lien, it also provides a series of strict requirements and procedures that a claimant must follow to properly exercise its rights. The claimant must carefully comply with all statutory requirements. This article does not endeavor to explain all the intricacies of the lien statute, but rather discusses three of the most common mistakes that result in the loss of lien rights.
See our lien and bond claim manual for a more detailed guide to construction liens in Washington.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kristina Southwell, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMs. Southwell may be contacted at
kristina.southwell@acslawyers.com
“Over? Did you say ‘over’?”
December 31, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyThe United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that under the Federal Arbitration Act, an arbitrator – and not a court – is to determine the preclusive effect of an arbitrator’s earlier ruling.
In the case, insurers engaged in three reinsurance agreements had previously arbitrated concerning one of the insurer’s billing methodologies. When a similar dispute occurred years later, the victors in the first arbitration – rather than pursuing arbitration – filed in federal court in Chicago seeking to have the court declare that the prior arbitration award precluded re-arbitration of the latest dispute. The insurer on the other side of the dispute moved to compel arbitration, a motion granted by the district court. The plaintiff insurers appealed.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
"On Second Thought"
October 28, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyRehearing requests are seldom granted by courts, and when they are, there’s usually something uniquely compelling in the request and the granting.
So is the case in a matter involving monies deposited in the registry of the federal court in New Orleans related to work performed on cleanup after Hurricanes Maria and Irma in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The party depositing monies – which represented subcontract sums paid to it by the general contractor – held back several hundred thousand dollars based on withholding provisions in the various contracts in play. The Court was tasked with evaluating not only a pay-when-paid provision in the subcontract of the claiming party, but also incorporation of the terms of a higher tiered contract which allowed for the withholding.
The Court initially granted summary judgment allowing the monies to be withheld. However, on request for rehearing, it was pointed up that while monies could be retained for purposes of covering attorney’s fees and costs related to litigation initiated by the plaintiff subcontractor’s vendors, there was a particular process for that withholding – and an assertion that the process was not followed.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
Why Being Climate ‘Positive’ Is the Buzzy New Goal of Green Building
December 10, 2024 —
Olivia Rudgard - BloombergThe three buildings, dotted around Norway, couldn’t look more different: a soaring timber-and-concrete obelisk in Porsgrunn; a squat, two-story Montessori school on the edge of a forest in Drøbak; and a concrete and glass wedge-shaped office in Trondheim, just a few hundred miles from the edge of the
Arctic Circle. But they share a distinctive feature. Each has a roof perfectly tilted to squeeze out every possible drop of solar energy.
They are called
Powerhouses, and the initiative behind them claims they are all “energy positive”: The upfront energy “cost” of each building, and that of later demolition and disposal, is expected to be made back over the building’s lifetime. Powerhouses sometimes draw from the grid, especially in winter, but in the long Nordic summer days they give back many times over, overspilling excess solar energy into surrounding homes and businesses.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Olivia Rudgard, Bloomberg
$31.5M Settlement Reached in Contract Dispute between Judlau and the Illinois Tollway
September 16, 2024 —
Annemarie Mannion - Engineering News-RecordThe Illinois Tollway will pay nearly $31.5 million to New York-based Judlau Contracting and its trade contractors to resolve a lawsuit filed after the tollway, in April, terminated a $324-million contract with Judlau to rebuild the southbound lanes of the Interstate 290 and Interstate 88 interchange near Oak Brook, Ill.
Reprinted courtesy of
Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com
Read the full story...
The Privette Doctrine and Its Exceptions: Court of Appeal Grapples With the Easy and Not So Easy
November 18, 2024 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogIn
CBRE v. Superior Court, 102 Cal.App.5th 639 (2024), the 4th District Court of Appeal grappled with a thorny and not-so-thorny issue involving injured parties under the Privette doctrine. The less thorny issue was whether application of the Privette doctrine depends on whether a written contract exists between the parties. Spoiler: It does not. The thorny issue was whether the Hooker exception to the Privette doctrine – which applies when a landowner exercises control over a project – should apply where a landowner directs a contractor to perform work that is at odds with legal requirements.
The CBRE Case
Property Reserve, Inc. owns an office building managed by CBRE in San Diego, California. On April 9, 2019, PRI entered into a lease agreement with a new tenant for a suite in the building. The lease required that PRI perform certain tenant improvements.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
Termination for Convenience Clauses: Maybe
Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways
Washington State Updates the Contractor Registration Statute
Construction Litigation Roundup: “You May Want an Intervention …”
Florida Passes Tort Reform Bill
Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey
Construction Defect Lawsuits May Follow Hawaii Condo Boom
Gatluak Ramdiet Named to The National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List
South Carolina Couple Must Arbitrate Construction Defect Claim
Ninth Circuit Finds Policy’s Definition of “Policy Period” Fatal to Insurer’s “Related Claims” Argument
Housing Agency Claims It Is Not a Party in Construction Defect Case
Pacing in Construction Scheduling Disputes
Insured Cannot Sue to Challenge Binding Appraisal Decision
Gibbs Giden is Pleased to Announce Four New Partners and Two New Associates
Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Replace Lawyers Anytime Soon
Repair of Fractured Girders Complete at Shuttered Salesforce Transit Center
Construction Defect Specialist Joins Kansas City Firm
S&P Suspended and Fined $80 Million in SEC, State Mortgage Bond Cases
California Case Is a Reminder That Not All Insurance Policies Are Alike Regarding COVID-19 Losses
Insured's Claim for Cyber Coverage Rejected
Philadelphia Enacts Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) Program
Construction Litigation Roundup: “D’Oh!”
A Chicago Skyscraper Cements the Legacy of a Visionary Postmodern Architect
Designers George Yabu and Glenn Pushelberg Discuss One57’s Ultra-Luxury Park Hyatt
Resolving Subcontractor Disputes with Pass-Through Claims and Liquidation Agreements
Hospital Inspection to Include Check for Construction Defects
Plaintiffs In Construction Defect Cases to Recover For Emotional Damages?
Pollution Exclusion Found Ambiguous
A General Contractors Guide to Bond Thresholds by State
Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Jason Taylor Obtain Summary Judgment For Insurance Carrier Client in Missouri Federal Court Coverage Action
Business and Professions Code Section 7031, Demurrers, and Just How Much You Can Dance
Determining Duty to Defend in Wisconsin Does Not Include Extrinsic Evidence
US Supreme Court Orders All Mountain Valley Gas Line Work to Proceed
The Sensible Resurgence of the Multigenerational Home
The Biggest Trials Coming to Courts Around the World in 2021
CDJ’s #6 Topic of the Year: Does Colorado Need Construction Defect Legislation to Spur Affordable Home Development?
Policy's One Year Suit Limitation Does Not Apply to Challenging the Insurer's Claims Handling
Tennessee Court of Appeals Holds Defendant Has the Burden of Offering Alternative Measure of Damages to Prove that Plaintiff’s Measure of Damages is Unreasonable
Massachusetts Pulls Phased Trigger On Its Statute of Repose
Contractual Setoff and Application When Performance Bond Buys Out of its Exposure
Efficient Proximate Cause Applies to Policy's Collapse Provisions
The Future Has Arrived: New Technologies in Construction
Texas res judicata and co-insurer defense costs contribution
Labor Under the Miller Act And Estoppel of Statute of Limitations
Hail Damage Requires Replacement of Even Undamaged Siding
Another Colorado Construction Defect Reform Bill Dies
Safety Data: Noon Presents the Hour of Greatest Danger
Emergency Paid Sick Leave and FMLA Leave Updates in Response to COVID-19
Loss Caused by Theft, Continuous Water Discharge Not Covered
#10 CDJ Topic: Carithers v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Red Wings Owner, Needing Hockey-Arena Neighborhood, Builds One
ing Is Impossible 
