Challenging a Termination for Default
September 23, 2024 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesNo contractor wants to be terminated for default. It is the harshest contractual recourse. It is a recourse that has implications, particularly in the public sector. However, a party needs to be in a position to support the basis of the termination for default, and the terminated party, in most instances, should not be in a position to imply accept the basis of the default. This applies regardless of the project.
In the federal context: “When a contractor challenges a default termination, the government bears the burden of establishing the validity of the termination.” Sergent’s Mechanical Systems, Inc. v. U.S., 2024 WL 4048175, *7 (Fed.Cl. 2024) (internal quotation and citation omitted). Once the government establishes the default, “the contractor bears the burden of establishing that the default was excused by fault of the government.” Id. at *8 (internal quotation and citation omitted).
Relevant considerations as to whether the contractor is in default include the contractor’s failure to meet contract specifications or the required schedule. Sergent’s Mechanical Systems, supra, at *8. “[T]here is ‘a requirement that the contractor give reasonable assurances of performance in response to a validly issued cure notice.” Id. (internal quotation and citation omitted).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Beyond the Flow-Down Clause: Subcontract Provisions That Can Expose General Contractors to Increased Liability and Inconsistent Outcomes
December 10, 2024 —
Phillip L. Parham III - ConsensusDocsFlow-down clauses in construction subcontracts—blanket clauses providing that some or all of the terms and conditions in the prime contract between the general contractor and the property owner apply equally between the subcontractor and general contractor—are an important component to managing risk for a general contractor and reducing the likelihood of disputes with either/both the owner and subcontractor. Put simply, flow-down provisions can provide continuity between the general contractor’s obligations to the owner and the subcontractor’s obligations to the general contractor. Properly drafted, flow-down clauses reduce the general contractor’s risk by ensuring that the subcontractor is legally bound to meet the owner’s objectives for the project in the same way as the general contractor. But relying on blanket flow-down clauses, alone, to protect the general contractor is like a soldier going into battle with nothing but a helmet, leaving significant other areas exposed and unprotected. In other words, a general contractor should look beyond just a singular, blanket flow down of terms to ensure its bases are properly covered.
Accordingly, this article goes beyond the blanket flow-down clause and highlights several key subcontract provisions where inconsistent obligations among the subcontractor, general contractor, and owner expose the general contractor to increased liability and inconsistent outcomes. Specifically, this article will examine disputes resolution clauses, liquidating provisions, notice provisions, and termination provisions. However, this article will not provide a deep examination of these clauses, nor does it highlight every potentially relevant clause. Rather, it focuses on these select clauses to highlight important issues associated with flow-down provisions.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Phillip L. Parham III, Jones Walker LLPMr. Parham may be contacted at
pparham@joneswalker.com
Spain Risks €10.6 Billion Flood Damage Bill, Sanchez Says
November 25, 2024 —
Rodrigo Orihuela, Macarena Munoz Montijano & Jorge Zuloaga - BloombergSpanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez announced the first financial package for victims of the storms that killed more than 200 people in the country’s eastern region of Valencia.
Spain will earmark as much as €10.6 billion ($11.5 billion) for its first relief package and more will be announced in the future, Sanchez said in a press conference Tuesday in Madrid. The package includes direct aid for households, self-employed workers and firms; state-backed credit guarantees for companies and residents; and funds for city governments to pay for repairs and reconstruction.
Reprinted courtesy of
Rodrigo Orihuela, Bloomberg,
Macarena Munoz Montijano, Bloomberg and
Jorge Zuloaga, Bloomberg Read the full story...
Bright-Line Changes: Prompt Payment Act Trends
September 16, 2024 —
Stephanie L. Cooksey - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Untimely payment by the owner for contract work and additional work on construction projects can place an unfair financial burden on contractors and subcontractors. Most states have attempted to eliminate or mitigate this inequity in construction contracting through Prompt Payment Acts that govern payment deadlines and provide remedies for untimely payment. This article addresses the legislative trends aimed at minimizing the risk of non-payment, overdue payment, and withholding retainage in favor of downstream parties to a construction contract.
Fortifying Contractor Protections with “Bright-Line” Language
Over the last decade, states have been tightening prompt payment laws by replacing broad, general statutory language with bright-line rules. What is a bright-line rule? A specific or definite figure, a quantifiable marker—i.e., something owners, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers should be aware of. Practically speaking, the more bright-line a prompt payment statute is, the greater the likelihood it will affect a construction project in your state.
A standard form construction contract, if not reviewed carefully, can create conflicts or confusion if it gives a party more leeway on payment deadlines than the applicable Prompt Payment Act. For example, consider an owner-issued Construction Change Directive (“CCD”) that requires a contractor to commence additional work immediately while a formal change order is negotiated. Consequently, a CCD can push financial burdens downstream, whether inadvertently or not, and may conflict with statutory payment deadlines. Nevertheless, an owner can be justified in its utilization of a CCD to maintain the project schedule. How should the parties competing interests be resolved?
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch” 2025 Editions
August 19, 2024 —
Wilke Fleury LLP2025 Best Lawyers & Ones to Watch
George Guthrie, Best Lawyer
Adriana Cervantes, One to Watch
Steven Williamson, Best Lawyer
Jason Eldred, One to Watch
Daniel Foster, Best Lawyer
David Frenznick, Best Lawyer
Kathryne Baldwin, One to Watch
Daniel Egan, Best Lawyer
Wilke Fleury is extremely proud to have five attorneys recognized in The Best Lawyers in America and three attorneys recognized in the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America! Best Lawyers has been regarded by lawyers and the public for more than 40 years as the most credible measure of legal integrity and distinction in the United States. Congratulations to this talented group!
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Wilke Fleury LLP
Nancy Conrad Recognized in Lehigh Valley Business 2024 Power in Law List
July 31, 2024 —
White and Williams LLPNancy Conrad, Chair of the Higher Education Group, Managing Partner of the Lehigh Valley Office and the President of the Pennsylvania Bar Association (PBA), has been named to the Lehigh Valley Business 2024 Power in Law List, for her work as a leader in the legal field.
This year’s honorees were asked to relate inspiration that pushed the pursuit of their career. One of her inspirations, as explained by Nancy in the article, was the opportunity to instruct and impact students while teaching during the day and pursuing a legal career in the evening at Temple Law which cemented a “commitment to excellence in the practice of law and service to the community.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
White and Williams LLP
Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court
July 31, 2024 —
Erica Whaley - Construction Law ZoneEarlier this year, the
Associated Subcontractors of Massachusetts hired Robinson+Cole attorney
Joseph Barra to submit an amicus brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for consideration in the appeal pending before it in
Business Interiors Floor Covering Business Trust v. Graycor Construction Co., Inc. In its June 17, 2024 decision in that case, the Court interpreted the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act, which applies to private construction projects and “requires that parties to a construction contract approve or reject payment within” an allotted time period and in compliance with certain procedures else such payments will be deemed approved. Two years ago, the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in
Tocci Building Corp. v. IRIV Partners, LLC, decided that an owner who fails to timely advise its general contractor of the reasons as to why it was withholding payment, coupled with failure to certify that such funds are being withheld in good faith, violates the Prompt Pay Act and makes the owner liable for funds owed.
[1] However, the Tocci Building Court left open the question of whether one who violates the Prompt Pay Act forfeits its substantive defenses to non-payment, such as fraud, defective work, or breach of material obligation of the contract.
The facts of Business Interiors involve a general contractor, Graycor, which subcontracted Business Interiors to perform certain flooring work for a movie theatre in Boston’s North End. When Graycor failed to formally approve, reject, or certify, in good faith, its withholding of payment of three of Business Interiors’ applications for payment as prescribed by the Prompt Pay Act, Business Interiors brought suit alleging, amon
Berger: FIGG Is Slow To Hand Over All Bridge Collapse DataWashington School District Sues Construction Company Over Water Pipe DamageEvergrande’s Condemned Towers on China’s Hawaii Show ThreatHigh School Gym Closed by Construction DefectsHome-Sales Fall in 2014 Has U.S. Waiting for 2015: EconomyIs Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/06/22Waiving Workers’ Compensation Immunity for Indemnity: Demystifying a Common and Scary-Looking Contract TermPensacola Bridge Halted Due to Alleged Construction DefectsIllinois Supreme Court Holds That the Implied Warranty of Habitability Does Not Extend to SubcontractorsHome Improvement in U.S. Slowing or Still Intact -- Which Is It?Still Going, After All This Time: the Sacketts, EPA and the Clean Water ActNew Jersey Court Rules on Statue of Repose CaseBeyond Inverse Condemnation in Wildfire Litigation: An Oregon Jury Finds Utility Liable for Negligence, Trespass and NuisanceWithdrawal of an Admission in California May Shift Costs—Including Attorneys’ Fees—Incurred in Connection with the WithdrawalNavigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction TechnologyContractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL PolicyInsurer Must Produce Documents After Failing To Show They Are ConfidentialResolve to Say “No” This YearColorado “occurrence”Meritage Acquires Legendary CommunitiesFinalists in San Diego’s Moving Parklet Design Competition AnnouncedCalifornia Court of Appeal Finds Alleged Inadequate Defense by Insurer-Appointed Defense Counsel Does Not Trigger a Right to Independent CounselSenate Committee Approves Military Construction FundsAppeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway ConstructionAthletic Trainers Help Workers Get Back to the Jobsite and Stay Healthy After InjuryNewmeyer & Dillion Named a Best Law Firm in 2019 in Multiple Practice Areas by U.S. News-Best LawyersWashington Court of Appeals Upholds Standard of Repose in Fruit Warehouse CaseAccident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent SupervisionContractor Sued for Contract Fraud by GovernmentEleven Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best LawyersHarmon Tower Opponents to Try MediationInsurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury RuleTriable Issue of Fact Exists as to Insurer’s Obligation to Provide Coverage Under Occurrence Policy10 Year Anniversary – Congratulations Greg PodolakConstruction Defect Claims Not CoveredGet Construction Defects in Writing Illinois Court Addresses Coverage Owed For Subcontractor’s Defective Work24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time HighsFlorida Continues Enacting Tort Reforms, This Time Shortening the Statute of ReposePolicy's Limitation Period for Seeking Replacement Costs Not Enforced Where UnreasonableDrought Dogs Developers in California's Soaring Housing MarketBest Lawyers Recognizes Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Honors Four Partners as ‘Lawyers of the Year’Performing Work with a Suspended CSLB License Costs Big: Subcontractor Faces $18,000,000 DisgorgementCalifornia to Build ‘Total Disaster City’ for TrainingMy Construction Law Wish ListHow Will Artificial Intelligence Impact Construction Litigation?Ninth Circuit Finds Policy’s Definition of “Policy Period” Fatal to Insurer’s “Related Claims” ArgumentPractical Advice: Indemnification and Additional Insured Issues RevisitedLargest Dam Removal Program in US History Reaches MilestoneFew Homes Available to Reno Buyers, Plenty of Commercial PropertiesIndemnification Against Release/“Disposal” of Hazardous MaterialsConstruction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams MeetingsCatching Killer Clauses in Contract NegotiationsAhlers, Cressman & Sleight PLLC Ranked Top Washington Law Firm By Construction ExecutiveJury's Verdict for Loss Caused by Collapse OverturnedMBS’s $500 Billion Desert Dream Just Keeps Getting WeirderNew Report Reveals Heavy Civil Construction Less Impacted by COVID-19 Than Commercial ConstructionInsurer Not Responsible for Insured's Assignment of Policy BenefitsLiability Policy’s Arbitration Endorsement Applies to Third Party Beneficiaries, Including Additional InsuredsHow Machine Learning Can Help with Urban DevelopmentNo Coverage Under Installation Policy When Read Together with Insurance ApplicationWhen “Substantially Similar” Means “Fundamentally Identical”: Delaware Court Enforces Related Claim Provision to Deny D&O Coverage for Securities Class ActionConstruction Needs Collaborative PlanningSchool District Practice Bulletin: Loose Lips Can Sink More Than ShipsBrief Discussion of Enforceability of Anti-Indemnity Statutes in CaliforniaWhat I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ PerspectiveSan Francisco Sues Over Sinking Millennium Tower 
