Changes to the Federal Rules – 2024
November 18, 2024 —
William L. Doerler - The Subrogation StrategistUnless Congress moves quickly, several amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence will take effect December 1, 2024. Below is a brief description of the amendments.
Rules of Evidence
Rule 107 is a new rule. This rule addresses illustrative aids, stating that, if such aid helps the trier of fact to understand the evidence or an argument, a party may use the aid if its utility is not substantially outweighed by the danger of, among other things, unfair prejudice. As noted under the discussion of Rule 1006, below, an illustrative aid - offered only to help the trier of fact understand the evidence - is generally not admissible into evidence.
Rule 613 currently states that extrinsic evidence of a witness’s prior inconsistent statement is admissible only if the witness is given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement and the adverse party is given an opportunity to examine the witness about it, or if justice so requires. As amended, the court has the discretion to forego this requirement.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
William L. Doerler, White and Williams LLPMr. Doerler may be contacted at
doerlerw@whiteandwilliams.com
Boston Team Secures Summary Judgment Dismissal on Client’s Behalf in Serious Personal Injury Case
October 21, 2024 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomBoston, Mass. (October 14, 2024) - Boston Managing Partner Kenneth B. Walton and Partner Matthew M. O' Leary recently secured summary judgment on behalf of a civil engineering firm in a serious personal injury matter arising from a trip-and-fall incident in a mall parking lot.
The client was retained to provide site civil engineering design for the parking lot of a local mall. The design included multiple bioretention areas known as rain gardens. In November of 2019, a woman tripped and fell while attempting to cross a rain garden to reach her car. She suffered significant bodily injuries, including a fracture of the cervical spine that resulted in partial paralysis.
The woman and her husband sued the mall's owner for negligence and loss of consortium in June 2021. The owner, in turn, impleaded Lewis Brisbois' client and the lot's builder, asserting third-party claims for contribution, contractual and common law indemnity, and breach of contract. In addition, the builder cross-claimed against Lewis Brisbois' client for contribution and common law indemnity.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Toolbox Talk Series Recap - The Mediator's Proposal
January 21, 2025 —
Douglas J. Mackin - The Dispute ResolverIn our final edition of the year of Division 1's Toolbox Talk Series on December 19, 2024,
Matthew Argue and
Gene Witkin discussed the use of the Mediator’s Proposal to bridge any final gaps to settlement between parties to a mediation. For those unfamiliar, a Mediator’s Proposal is a settlement proposal that the mediator makes to all parties to the dispute simultaneously. Each party then advises the mediators in confidence whether they accept or reject the proposal. The Mediator will communicate to all the parties that the Mediator’s Proposal is accepted only if all parties accept.
Argue and Witkin emphasized that the Mediator’s Proposal is not a shortcut and should not be used simply to split the difference. Instead, it is a tool available to the mediator to push the parties to resolution after they have had robust negotiations, understand the strengths and weaknesses of the positions of each side, and have made progress towards at least getting within range of one another. A successful Mediator’s Proposal depends on the mediator (and the parties) having sufficient information to make a credible recommendation and creating an environment where all parties will consider the Mediator’s Proposal in good faith.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Douglas J. Mackin, Cozen O’ConnorMr. Mackin may be contacted at
dmackin@cozen.com
Construction Litigation Roundup: “D’Oh!”
August 12, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyThe U.S. DOL found itself on June 24 on the wrong end of a preliminary injunction concerning recent changes to the Davis-Bacon Act.
The lawsuit, initiated in Texas federal court by the Associated General Contractors of America and other concerned citizens, sought a preliminary injunction barring implementation and enforcement of “specified portions of § 5.2 and § 5.5(e) of the DOL’s ‘Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations’” – the “Final Rule,” published August 23, 2023.
After determining the appropriateness of the “standing” of the plaintiffs based upon the plaintiffs being “adversely affected” by the Final Rule, the federal court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the Final Rule. In noting its disagreement with the Final Rule, the court stated:
“… the Final Rule amends the DBA [the Davis-Bacon Act] by imposing a stealth selfimplementing DBA requirement in the contract by an operation-of-law provision that contradicts the express statutory language of the Act [the court bristling at the idea that contracts might exclude with impunity the otherwise mandated DBA clauses]. Further, the Final Rule amends the Act to extend the DBA to apply to workers who are not mechanics and laborers, and to extend the scope of the work covered by DBA to include work is not performed ‘directly on the site of the work.’
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
New Jersey Law Firm Announces $4 Million Settlement from Construction Site Accident
November 11, 2024 —
Greenberg Minasian, LLCWEST ORANGE, N.J., Nov. 07, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Greenberg Minasian, LLC, a personal injury law firm located in Essex County, New Jersey, has announced a $4 million settlement stemming from a roofer who suffered serious injuries after a construction site fall. Veteran trial attorney Mitchell Goldstein represented the injured client, who suffered multiple fractures and injuries, permanently affecting his ability to work.
In 2018, Robert Smith, who was 61 at the time, fell backward through or over a temporary guard rail at the American Dream Mall in East Rutherford, NJ. The 30-foot fall caused him to suffer serious injuries to his pubis, sacrum, clavicle, and humerus, leading to multiple surgeries and a hip replacement.
On behalf of his client, Mr. Goldstein brought suit against the mall developer and construction company, successfully arguing that the temporary guardrails were improperly constructed and insufficiently elevated according to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. The case was settled just two days before trial, marking a significant victory for the plaintiff and his family.
Despite the defense's attempt to argue that Mr. Smith was responsible for his fall, Goldstein was able to refute their claims, asserting that the temporary guardrail's improper construction directly led to the accident.
About Greenberg Minasian LLC
Based in West Orange, Greenberg Minasian represents clients who have been seriously injured as the result of negligence by others. The firm handles cases anywhere in New Jersey including West Orange, Jersey City, Newark, Essex County and all surrounding areas. The firm continues to achieve the highest awards for its clients and families.
Toolbox Talk Series Recap - Guided Choice Mediation
November 05, 2024 —
Douglas J. Mackin - The Dispute ResolverIn the September 26, 2024 edition of Division 1's Toolbox Talk Series,
Clifford Shapiro presented on Guided Choice Mediation (“GCM”) and how it can lead to better outcomes in construction disputes.
GCM is an approach to mediation that focuses on early and efficient dispute resolution, which prominent mediators created as a public interest project.
Shapiro described his particular variant of GCM based on his experience while acknowledging that other Guided Choice Mediators’ processes may differ from his in various ways. Shapiro’s brand of GCM focuses on ensuring that parties have reasonable expectations and appropriate settlement authority prior to arriving at a mediation. Some of the strategies to help accomplish these noble goals are (i) early mediator engagement, (ii) mediator facilitation of information exchange, (iii) mediator involvement with insurance issues (particularly important in construction defect cases, especially those with multiple defendants), (iii) pre-mediation ex parte meetings, and (iv) mediator participation in risk analysis. These strategies are not typical in the more traditional/historic approach to mediation in which mediation is scheduled based on a scheduling order, mediation statements are sent to the mediator roughly a week before the scheduled mediation (and sometimes not even shared with anyone other than the mediator), and the parties speak with the mediator for the first time on the day of the mediation.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Douglas J. Mackin, Cozen O’ConnorMr. Mackin may be contacted at
dmackin@cozen.com
First Circuit Finds No Coverage For Subcontracted Faulty Work
December 17, 2024 —
Eric Hermanson & Austin Moody - White and Williams LLPAfter almost two years' deliberation, the First Circuit last week issued its long-awaited decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Tocci Bldg. Corp.[1]: affirming on other grounds, and leaving in place a district court decision that found subcontracted faulty work was not an "occurrence" and did not lead to covered “property damage” under Massachusetts law.
The decision leaves Massachusetts among a number of states where general contractors should not expect coverage from their commercial general liability (CGL) insurers for damage falling within the contractor’s scope of work.
Since the "scope of work" – where general contractors are involved – often encompasses an entire project, contractors who want coverage in Massachusetts should take care to make alternative arrangements: transferring risk to subcontractors through indemnity provisions and additional-insured endorsements, or relying on other policy forms where available.
Reprinted courtesy of
Eric Hermanson, White and Williams LLP and
Austin Moody, White and Williams LLP
Mr. Hermanson may be contacted at hermansone@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Moody may be contacted at moodya@whiteandwilliams.com
Read the full story...
Five Issues to Consider in Government Contracting (Or Any Contracting!)
September 02, 2024 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesThe appeal of Appeals of – Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & Services, LLC, ASBCA 62797, 2024 WL 2698011 (May 7, 2024) raises interesting, but important, issues that should be considered. In this case, the government (in a supply contract) procured four portal cranes from the claimant. After an initial test of one of the cranes failed, the government refused to accept delivery even after the issue was addressed by the claimant. The government did not accept the manner in which the claimant addressed the issue and would only accept cranes if the claimant employed “an unnecessary alternative solution [that] caused further delay and increased [
Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred ThousandSunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second TimeU.S. Homeownership Rate Falls to Lowest Since Early 1995Mortgage Bonds Stare Down End of Fed Easing as Gains PersistCourthouse Reporter Series: The Bizarre Case That Required a 117-Year-Old ExpertResilience: Transforming the Energy Sector – Navigating Land Issues in Solar and Storage Projects | Episode 3 (11.14.24)Managing Narrative, Capturing Context, and Building Together: Talking VR and AEC with David Weir-McCallWhy Insurers and Their Attorneys
FEMA, Congress Eye Pre-Disaster Funding, Projects
Robots on Construction Sites Are Raising Legal Questions
University of Tennessee’s New Humanities Building Construction Set to Begin
Court Finds That Split in Underground Storage Tank is Not a Covered Collapse
CA Supreme Court Finds “Consent-to-Assignment” Clauses Unenforceable After Loss Occurs During the Policy Period
Risk Management and Contracting after Hurricane Irma: Suggestions to Avoid a Second Disaster
The Insurance Coverage Debate on Construction Defects Continues
Texas Jury Finds Presence of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Causes “Physical Loss or Damage” to Property, Awards Over $48 Million to Baylor College of Medicine
Arbitration and Mediation: What’s the Difference? What to Expect.
Claim Against Broker for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage Survives Summary Judgment
What You Need to Know About Enforcement Actions by the Contractors State License Board
Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim
Is Ohio’s Buckeye Lake Dam Safe?
Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii
How BIM Helps Make Buildings Safer
How To Lock Disputes Out Of Your Project In Construction
Trumark Homes Hired James Furey as VP of Land Acquisition
AI in Construction: What Does It Mean for Our Contractors?
Miller Act Bond Claims Subject to “Pay If Paid”. . . Sometimes
Harvey's Aftermath Will Rattle Construction Supply Chain, Economists Say
The Condominium Warranty Against Structural Defects in the District of Columbia
Washington Supreme Court Finds Agent’s Representations in Certificate of Insurance Bind Insurance Company to Additional Insured Coverage
You Are Not A “Liar” Simply Because You Amend Your Complaint
Award Doubled in Retrial of New Jersey Elevator Injury Case
How SmartThings Wants to Automate Your Home
HB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection Changes
Force Majeure Recommendations
General Contractors Have Expansive Common Law and Statutory Duties To Provide a Safe Workplace
Intel's $20B Ohio 'Mega-Site' is Latest Development in Chip Makers' Rush to Boost US Production
Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks
Congratulations to Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser for Being Recognized as 2022 Super Lawyers!
Construction Termination Part 2: How to Handle Construction Administration When the Contractor Is Getting Fired
Why A Jury Found That Contractor 'Retaliated' Against Undocumented Craft Worker
Environmental Justice: A Legislative and Regulatory Update
New York Building Boom Spurs Corruption Probe After Death
When it Comes to Trials, it’s Like a Box of Chocolates. Sometimes You Get the Icky Cream Filled One
Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills
Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion
Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims
Limited Number of Insurance-Related Bills Passed by 2014 Hawaii Legislature
A Top U.S. Seller of Carbon Offsets Starts Investigating Its Own Projects
Suit Against Broker for Securing Inadequate Coverage Dismissed on Statute of Limitations Grounds
The Increasing Trend of Caps in Construction Contracts and Negotiating Them
The Power of Planning: Four Key Themes for Mitigating Risk in Construction
Sanctions of $1.6 Million Plus Imposed on Contractor for Fabricating Evidence
FEMA Offers to Review Hurricane Sandy Claims
Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million
Federal Interpleader Dealing with Competing Claims over Undisputed Payable to Subcontractor
Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”
NYC Design Firm Executives Plead Guilty in Pay-to-Play Scheme
