Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms TM of 2024 by Construction Executive
July 15, 2024 —
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCACS is proud to announce that it has once again been ranked among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Construction Executive 2023 rankings.
Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry, and its articles are designed to help owners and top managers run a more profitable and productive construction business.
Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 hundred U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2023 revenues from the firm’s construction practice, the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice, percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice, the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice, the year in which the construction practice was established, and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2023.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
Forum Selection Provisions Are Not to Be Overlooked…Even On Federal Projects
September 16, 2024 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesForum selection provisions are NOT to be overlooked. Ever. Treat them seriously. Even on federal projects where there is a Miller Act payment bond. Consider forum selection provisions on the front end when negotiating your contract.
In a recent opinion, U.S. f/u/b/o Timberline Construction Group, LLC vs. Aptim Federal Services, LLC, 2024 WL 3597164 (M.D.Fla. 2024), a joint venture prime contractor was hired by the federal government to build a temporary housing site. The joint venture prime contractor obtained a Miller Act payment bond. The joint venture then entered into a subcontract with one of its joint venture members and the member-subcontractor then engaged a sub-subcontractor. The sub-subcontractor claimed it was owed $3.5 Million and sued the member-subcontractor, as well as the prime contractor’s Miller Act payment bond, in the Middle District of Florida. The member-subcontractor and the Miller Act payment bond sureties moved to transfer venue to the Middle District of Louisiana pursuant to a forum selection clause in the contract between the sub-subcontractor and the member-subcontractor. The contract provided that the exclusive venue would be a United States District Court located in Louisiana.
Forum selection provisions are analyzed in federal court under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a): “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented.” U.S. f/u/b/o Timberline, supra at *2. A forum selection provision is presumptively valid and given controlling weight. Id. (quotations and citations omitted).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Five Issues to Consider in Government Contracting (Or Any Contracting!)
September 02, 2024 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesThe appeal of Appeals of – Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & Services, LLC, ASBCA 62797, 2024 WL 2698011 (May 7, 2024) raises interesting, but important, issues that should be considered. In this case, the government (in a supply contract) procured four portal cranes from the claimant. After an initial test of one of the cranes failed, the government refused to accept delivery even after the issue was addressed by the claimant. The government did not accept the manner in which the claimant addressed the issue and would only accept cranes if the claimant employed “an unnecessary alternative solution [that] caused further delay and increased [claimant’s] costs.” On appeal, it was determined the government’s decision to delay delivery based on its demand for the alternative solution was not justified, i.e., constituted a breach of contract. Below are five issues of consideration in government contracting, or, for that matter, any contracting.
Issue #1- Patently Ambiguous Specifications
The government argued that the specifications were patently ambiguous and because the claimant failed to inquire regarding the ambiguous specifications prior to performance, its interpretation of the ambiguous specifications should govern. The contractor countered that the specifications were unambiguous and it met the specifications.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Deadline Nears for “Green Performance Bond” Implementation
December 03, 2024 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsFor this weeks Guest Post Friday at Musings, we welcome Surety Bonds.com, a leading online surety provider. SuretyBonds.com specializes in educating current and prospective business owners about local surety requirements. To keep up with surety bond trends, follow and Surety Bonds Insider blog and @suretybond on Twitter.
Professionals who work in the construction industry know the laws that regulate the market change constantly. Unfortunately, even government agencies are flawed, which means they sometimes establish nonsensical, arbitrary regulations that leave construction professionals even more confused as to how they’re expected to do their jobs.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
America’s Factories Weren’t Built to Endure This Many Hurricanes
November 05, 2024 —
Brooke Sutherland - BloombergAmerica’s factories aren’t built for the current cascade of extreme weather events.
Dozens of
industrial sites were in the zone of impact as Hurricane Milton slammed into Florida’s West Coast this week, including several concrete plants, speed boat manufacturing operations and facilities owned by
Honeywell International Inc., Johnson Controls International Plc,
General Electric Co. and Illinois Tool Works Inc., among others. Meanwhile, a Baxter International Inc. facility in Marion, North Carolina, that makes 60% of the intravenous fluids used in hospitals around the country was
shuttered because of damage from Hurricane Helene just two weeks ago. Mines responsible for producing more than 80% of the world’s supply of commercial high-purity quartz in nearby Spruce Pine
were also affected by severe flooding, raising the risk of disruptions to semiconductor production, which relies on the material.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Brooke Sutherland, Bloomberg
Slow Down?
December 03, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyAbsolutely not, said the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal to a masonry subcontractor being sued for allegedly improperly refusing to honor a subcontract bid.
A general contractor preparing its overall bid for a public project in Jefferson Parish relied in the process on the defendant masonry subcontractor’s bid. After a public bid process and receiving the award of the project, the general contractor was informed by the subcontractor that it believed that the unit price form that had been supplied to the sub “contained inaccuracies.” Notwithstanding offers by the GC to endeavor to address the purported “inaccuracies” during the project, most likely by a change order, the subcontractor refused to execute its subcontract. The general contractor then awarded the masonry work to another subcontractor for $368,222 more than the original sub’s bid.
The GC filed suit – for recovery of $368,222 – against the defendant subcontractor during the course of the public project. The defendant sub objected, arguing to the court that the lawsuit was “premature.” At the heart of the prematurity argument: the sub urging that the general contractor filed suit before its right to recover damages had accrued.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
Chicago Cubs Agree to Make Wrigley Field ADA Improvements to Settle Feds' Lawsuit
December 03, 2024 —
James Leggate - Engineering News-RecordMajor League Baseball’s Chicago Cubs have entered into a settlement with the U.S. Dept. of Justice over renovations to Wrigley Field, federal and Cubs officials announced Oct. 31. As part of the settlement, the team agreed to update Wrigley Field with more accessibility options for people with disabilities.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
James Leggate, ENRMr. Leggate may be contacted at
leggatej@enr.com
Amazon Can be Liable in Louisiana
August 05, 2024 —
Michael J. Ciamaichelo - The Subrogation StrategistIn June 2024, the Supreme Court of Louisiana held that: (1) Amazon can be considered a “seller” of defective products sold by third parties on its website; and (2) Amazon can be liable under a theory of negligent undertaking for third-party products. In Pickard v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2023-CQ-01596, 2024 La. LEXIS 1112, a Louisiana man, Archie Pickard, died from burns sustained in a house fire allegedly caused by a defective battery charger purchased on Amazon from a third-party seller located in China. Mr. Pickard’s family filed a lawsuit against Amazon in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana alleging claims under the Louisiana Products Liability Act (LPLA) and for negligent undertaking. Amazon filed a motion for summary judgment, which prompted the federal court to certify questions to the Supreme Court of Louisiana regarding these two claims.
Amazon Can be a “Seller” Under the Louisiana Products Liability Act
Amazon does not neatly fit within the definition of “seller” under the LPLA because the LPLA was drafted in 1988, before the internet existed. The LPLA defines a “seller” as a person or entity (who is not the manufacturer) who conveys title or possession of the product to another for something of value. La R.S. 9.2800.53(s) (emphasis added). The Supreme Court of Louisiana determined that Amazon was a “seller” because it conveyed “possession” of the charger to Mr. Pickard through the “Fulfillment by Amazon” (FBA) program, which provides storage, delivery, customer service, and returns of third-party products sold on Amazon. Most products on Amazon are sold by third parties, rather than Amazon. Many third-party sellers are small or medium-size companies, and some are individuals seeking to make supplemental income. Amazon offers the FBA program to handle storage and logistics to third-party sellers. When a product is sold through the FBA program, the seller sends the product to Amazon’s warehouses, where it is stored until it is purchased. When an FBA-product is purchased, Amazon collects payment, delivers the product (often in an Amazon van), and handles the potential return of the product. The Supreme Court of Louisiana determined that Amazon was a “seller” of the battery charger even though Amazon did not pass title to Mr. Pickard because: (1) Amazon had physical custody of the charger while stored in the warehouse
COVID-19 Damages and Time Recovery: Contract Checklist and AnalysisBrad Pitt’s Foundation Sues New Orleans Architect for Construction DefectsConstruction Manager’s Win in Michigan after Michigan Supreme Court Finds a Subcontractor’s Unintended Faulty Work is an ‘Occurrence’ Under CGLTwo More Lawsuits Filed Over COVID-19 Business Interruption LossesMontana Court Finds Duty to Defend over Construction Defect AllegationOne to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional DutiesJust a House That Uses 90 Percent Less Energy Than Yours, That's AllCode Changes Pave Way for CLT in Tall Buildings and Spark Flammability DebateThe Association of Southern California Defense Counsel (ASCDC) and the Construction Defect Claims Managers Association (CDMA) Annual Construction Defect SeminarConstruction Contractor “Mean Tweets” EditionI’m Sorry, So Sorry: Legal Implications of Apologies and Admissions of Fault for Delaware Healthcare ProfessionalsConcerns About On-the-job Safety PersistNo Entitlement to Reimbursement of Pre-Tender FeesBlackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate DramaUpdate: Amazon Can (Still) Be Liable in LouisianaColorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability PolicyNot Remotely Law as Usual: Don’t Settle for Delays – Settle at Remote MediationSafer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction DefectsCoverage for Construction Defects Barred By Exclusion j (5)Home Prices Up, Inventory DownReminder: The Devil is in the Mechanic’s Lien DetailsAssessments Underway After Hurricane Milton Rips Off Stadium Roof, Snaps Crane Boom in FloridaStructural Defects Lead Schools to Close off AreasNew American Home Construction Nears Completion Despite ObstaclesThe 2023 Term of the Supreme Court: Administrative and Regulatory Law RulingsBe Careful How You Terminate: Terminating for Convenience May Limit Your Future RightsReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up (07/13/22)Colorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” StandardWashington Supreme Court Upholds King County Ordinance Requiring Utility Providers to Pay for Access to County’s Right-of-Way and Signals Approval for Other Counties to Follow SuitReversing Itself, Alabama Supreme Court Finds Construction Defect is An OccurrenceIs the Construction Industry Actually a Technology Hotbed?New Plan Submitted for Explosive Demolition of Old Tappan Zee BridgeFlorida Issues Emergency Fraud Prevention Rule to Protect Policyholders in Wake of Catastrophic StormsDenial of Claim for Concealment or Fraud Reversed by Sixth CircuitKey Legal Considerations for Modular Construction ContractsUnlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting OperationIncrease in Single-Family New Home Sales Year-Over-Year in JanuaryNEW DEFECT WARRANTY LAWS – Now Applicable to Condominiums and HOAs transitioning from Developer to Homeowner Control. Is Your Community Aware of its Rights Under the New Laws?New Illinois Supreme Court Trigger Rule for CGL Personal Injury “Offenses” Could Have Costly Consequences for PolicyholdersScotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek ActionSubcontractors on Washington Public Projects can now get their Retainage Money SoonerFailure to Meet Code Case Remanded to Lower Court for Attorney FeesCalifornia Indemnity and Defense Construction Law Changes for 2013Revisiting Statutory Offers to CompromiseA Lack of Sophistication With the Construction Contract Can Play Out In an Ugly DisputeDorian’s Wrath: How Event Cancellation Insurance Helps Businesses Recoup Losses from Severe WeatherArizona – New Discovery Rules Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts IncreaseSettlement between IOSHA and Mid-America Reached after Stage Collapse FatalitiesDetermining the Cause of the Loss from a Named Windstorm when there is Water Damage - New JerseyAvoid the Headache – Submit the Sworn Proof of Loss to Property InsurerBalestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising StarCongratulations 2024 DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars 
