BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure Building Consultant Opelika Alabama housing Building Consultant Opelika Alabama custom homes Building Consultant Opelika Alabama mid-rise construction Building Consultant Opelika Alabama industrial building Building Consultant Opelika Alabama hospital construction Building Consultant Opelika Alabama custom home Building Consultant Opelika Alabama casino resort Building Consultant Opelika Alabama concrete tilt-up Building Consultant Opelika Alabama Subterranean parking Building Consultant Opelika Alabama retail construction Building Consultant Opelika Alabama institutional building Building Consultant Opelika Alabama multi family housing Building Consultant Opelika Alabama office building Building Consultant Opelika Alabama townhome construction Building Consultant Opelika Alabama production housing Building Consultant Opelika Alabama Medical building Building Consultant Opelika Alabama landscaping construction Building Consultant Opelika Alabama condominium Building Consultant Opelika Alabama structural steel construction Building Consultant Opelika Alabama condominiums Building Consultant Opelika Alabama tract home Building Consultant Opelika Alabama
    Opelika Alabama expert witnesses fenestrationOpelika Alabama consulting architect expert witnessOpelika Alabama hospital construction expert witnessOpelika Alabama construction defect expert witnessOpelika Alabama construction forensic expert witnessOpelika Alabama window expert witnessOpelika Alabama construction project management expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Opelika, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Opelika Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lee Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0136
    528 Lafayette Pl
    Auburn, AL 36830
    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Phenix City
    Local # 0172
    1808 Opelika Road
    Phenix City, AL 36867
    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Tallapoosa Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0186
    714 Commerce Drive
    Alexander City, AL 35010
    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117

    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124

    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Tuscaloosa
    Local # 0188
    2009 Paul W Bryant Dr
    Tuscaloosa, AL 35401

    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Chilton County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0117
    209 Parliament Parkway
    Maylene, AL 35114
    Opelika Alabama Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Opelika Alabama


    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    VOSH Jumps Into the Employee Misclassification Pool

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    Viewpoint: A New Approach to Job Site Safety Reaps Benefits

    Alabama Still “An Outlier” on Construction Defects

    Florida “Property Damage” caused by an “Occurrence” and “Your Work” Exclusion

    Wine without Cheese? (Why a construction contract needs an order of precedence clause)(Law Note)

    Landlords Beware: Subordination Agreements

    Alert: AAA Construction Industry Rules Update

    Banks Rejected by U.S. High Court on Mortgage Securities Suits

    Oregon to Add 258,000 Jobs by 2022, State Data Shows

    New OSHA Rule Creates Electronic Reporting Requirement

    Construction Defect Journal Seeks Article Submissions Regarding SB800 and Other Builders Right to Repair Laws

    Governor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One Year

    Another Defect Found on the Bay Bridge: Water Leakage

    Brooklyn’s Industry City to Get $1 Billion Modernization

    Fraudster Sells 24-Bedroom ‘King’s Speech’ London Mansion

    Addenda to Construction Contracts Can Be an Issue

    United States Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

    "Abrupt Falling Down of Building or Part of Building" as Definition of Collapse Found Ambiguous

    New Jersey’s Governor Puts Construction Firms on Formal Notice of His Focus on Misclassification of Workers as Independent Contractors

    Boston Nonprofit Wants to Put Grown-Ups in Dorms

    Manhattan Trophy Home Sellers Test Buyer Limits on Price

    Contractor Not Liable for Flooding House

    Colorado Passes Compromise Bill on Construction Defects

    Disaster Remediation Contracts: Understanding the Law to Avoid a Second Disaster

    Terminating A Subcontractor Or Sub-Tier Contractor—Not So Fast—Read Your Contract!

    How to Challenge a Project Labor Agreement

    Paris ‘Locks of Love’ Overload Bridges, Threatening Structures

    Utility Contractor Held Responsible for Damaged Underground Electrical Line

    Depreciating Labor Costs May be Factor in Actual Cash Value

    Repairs Could Destroy Evidence in Construction Defect Suit

    Insurer Must Defend and Indemnify Construction Defect Claims Under Iowa Law

    Is Construction Defect Litigation a Cause for Lack of Condos in Minneapolis?

    Balcony Collapses Killing Six People

    Unrelated Claims Against Architects Amount to Two Different Claims

    New Jersey Senate Advances Bad Faith Legislation

    White and Williams Earns National "Best Law Firm" Rankings from US News

    Court of Appeal Opens Pandora’s Box on Definition of “Contractor” for Forum Selection Clauses

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

    Modular Homes Test Energy Efficiency Standards

    Can General Contractors Make Subcontractors Pay for OSHA Violations?

    Court Rules in Favor of Treasure Island Developers in Environmental Case

    Insured's Jury Verdict Reversed After Improper Trial Tactics

    Chinese Brooklyn-to-Los Angeles Plans Surge: Real Estate

    Renters ‘Sold Out’ by NYC Pensions Press Mayor on Housing

    No Coverage for Additional Insured After Completion of Operations

    Alabama Court Determines No Coverage For Insured's Faulty Workmanship

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800
    Corporate Profile

    OPELIKA ALABAMA BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Opelika, Alabama Building Consultant Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Opelika, Alabama

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Negligence and Private Nuisance

    July 10, 2018 —
    The court determined there was a duty to defend negligence and private nuisance claims for dumping materials on the plaintiffs' property. Peters Heavy Construction, Inc. v. X-Pert One Tracking Corp., 2018 Wisc. App. LEXIS 358 (Wis. Ct. App. March 29, 2018). Peters Heavy Construction sued X-Pert One for negligently depositing shingle materials, tires, and other solid materials on Peters' property, causing damage to Peters, including loss of use of portions of the property. Peters also alleged that X-Pert One's actions negligently created a private nuisance causing harm to Peters' property. X-Pert One's insurer, Northfield Insurance Company, was also sued. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Investigators Eye Fiber Optic Work in Deadly Wisconsin Explosion

    July 18, 2018 —
    A hole punched into a 4-in.-dia gas pipeline during fiber-optic line laying is blamed for an explosion that killed a 34-year-old fire captain and injured nine other people, including four firefighters, in downtown Sun Prairie, Wis., on July 10. The injured were treated at nearby hospitals and have since been released. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, ENR
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    New York Court Holds Radioactive Materials Exclusion Precludes E&O Coverage for Negligent Phase I Report

    October 30, 2018 —
    In its recent decision in Merritt Environmental Consulting Corp. v. Great Divide Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175527 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2018), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York had occasion to consider the application of a radioactive materials exclusion in a professional liability policy. Great Divide’s insured, Merritt Environmental, was hired as an environmental consultant by a bank in connection with a mortgage refinance of a property located in Westchester County, New York. Merritt’s responsibility was to prepare a Phase I environmental report concerning the property, which the bank ultimately relied on in agreeing to the refinance. It was later claimed, however, that Merritt’s report failed to document the full extent of the property’s radium and uranium contamination resulting from its use in the Manhattan Project. Merritt was named in two separate lawsuits as a result of its allegedly faulty report, including one by the bank alleging that Merritt negligently prepared its report. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brian Margolies, Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
    Mr. Margolies may be contacted at bmargolies@tlsslaw.com

    Pennsylvania Sues Firms to Recoup Harrisburg Incinerator Losses

    June 06, 2018 —
    The state of Pennsylvania continues to try to recover funds from professional firms involved in the city of Harrisburg’s disastrous incinerator project in the early 2000’s and has named, Buchart Horn, Inc., an engineering, architecture and planning firm based in York, Pa. as a defendant. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jonathan Barnes, ENR
    ENR staff may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

    As Florence Eyes East Coast, Are You Looking At Your Insurance?

    October 02, 2018 —
    Hurricane Florence will affect the U.S. east coast later this week with significant damage to property and resulting business disruption. Businesses far-removed from the impact zone also will be affected as manufacturing, retail, travel and supply chains, among other industries, are disrupted by the physical damage. For those in the impact zone, knowing the fundamentals about your property insurance is critical. For those in remote locations, now is a good time to refresh yourself as well, since post-storm disruptions and losses require prompt notice to insurers and fast action to help mitigate any resulting loss. A failure on either front could jeopardize coverage. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@HuntonAK.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@HuntonAK.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Texas Court Construes Breach of Contract Exclusion Narrowly in Duty-to-Defend Case

    September 10, 2018 —
    In a victory for policyholders, a recent decision from the Western District of Texas narrowly construed a common breach-of-contract exclusion and held that the insurer had a duty to defend its insured against an underlying lawsuit over construction defects. The allegations potentially supported a covered claim, as the conduct of the insured’s subcontractor could have been an independent, “but for” cause of the property damage at issue, thereby triggering the insurer’s duty to defend. In Slay, the insured – a construction company – was hired by a city to design and construct a municipal sports complex, including Little League baseball fields, a softball field, parking lots, and a swimming pool. The construction company hired a subcontractor to perform various services on the project, including paving parking lots and laying the cement for the pool. After completing the project, one of the construction company’s employees noticed cracking in the parking lot and the pool. The construction company notified the city and tried to work out a repair plan, but the city refused and eventually sued, alleging construction defects and asserting claims for breach of contract and negligence. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Tae Andrews, Hunton Andrews Kurth Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@HuntonAK.com Mr. Andrews may be contacted at tandrews@HuntonAK.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Haight Attorneys Selected to 2018 Southern California Rising Stars List

    June 13, 2018 —
    Haight proudly announces that Partner Michael C. Parme and attorneys Frances Ma and Kristian B. Moriarty have been selected to the 2018 Southern California Rising Stars list. Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service that lists outstanding lawyers from a wide range of practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

    Need to Cover Yourself for “Crisis” Changes on a Job Site? Try These Tips (guest post)

    July 02, 2018 —
    Today, we welcome back friend of the blog Christopher G. Hill. Chris is a LEED AP, a Virginia Supreme Court certified mediator, construction lawyer and owner of the Richmond, VA firm, The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Chris authors the Construction Law Musings blog where he discusses legal and policy issues relevant to construction professionals. As construction professionals we’ve all been there. Something happens on a job site that requires immediate attention and possibly a changed sequence of work or possibly a change to a subcontractor’s scope. It could be a buried power line that Miss Utility failed to mark properly or an owner that wants a different HVAC configuration at the last minute. It could also simply be that it rained too much, and work had to slow down. The above examples are instances of items that are beyond the control of the general contractor or the subcontractors and are the type that require shifts in work schedules and changes in scope that must be dealt with on the fly and require quick decisions and immediate action if the project is to meet any time of completion reasonably close to that which is listed in the contract documents. It can often seem that there is no time to meet the written change order provisions of any well drafted construction contract. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com