BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska high-rise construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska concrete tilt-up Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska parking structure Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska industrial building Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska casino resort Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska hospital construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska townhome construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska low-income housing Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska institutional building Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska landscaping construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska Medical building Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska structural steel construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska office building Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska condominiums Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska production housing Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska retail construction Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska Subterranean parking Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska custom homes Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska custom home Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska condominium Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska tract home Building Consultant Nunam Iqua Alaska
    Nunam Iqua Alaska consulting engineersNunam Iqua Alaska construction expert witness consultantNunam Iqua Alaska construction project management expert witnessNunam Iqua Alaska construction defect expert witnessNunam Iqua Alaska multi family design expert witnessNunam Iqua Alaska expert witness commercial buildingsNunam Iqua Alaska expert witness structural engineer
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Nunam Iqua, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Nunam Iqua Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Nunam Iqua Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Nunam Iqua Alaska


    Pipeline Safety Violations Cause of Explosion that Killed 8

    Reminder: In Court (as in life) the Worst Thing You Can Do Is Not Show Up

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    Framework, Tallest Mass Timber Project in the U.S., Is On Hold

    Insurer Must Indemnify Additional Insured After Settlement

    Reversing Itself, West Virginia Supreme Court Holds Construction Defects Are Covered

    Merger to Create Massive Los Angeles Construction Firm

    The NAR asks FAA to Amend their Drone Rules for Real Estate Use

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    Leaning San Francisco Tower Seen Sinking From Space

    Motion to Dismiss Denied Regarding Insureds' Claim For Collapse

    Is Equipment Installed as Part of Building Renovations a “Product” or “Construction”?

    Las Vegas Harmon Hotel to be Demolished without Opening

    Microsoft Said to Weigh Multibillion-Dollar Headquarters Revamp

    Construction Defect Class Action Lawsuit Alleges National Cover-up of Pipe Defects

    Structural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro Job

    Failure to Consider Safety Element in Design Does Not Preclude Public Entity’s Discretionary Authority Under Design Immunity Defense

    University of California Earthquake Report Provides List of Old Concrete Buildings in LA

    Housing Buoyed by 20-Year High for Vet’s Loans: Mortgages

    Napa Quake Seen Costing Up to $4 Billion as Wineries Shut

    U.S. Department of Justice Settles against Days Inn

    Fundamental Fairness Trumps Contract Language

    Insurance and Your Roof

    Practical Pointers for Change Orders on Commercial Construction Contracts

    Property Damage Caused By Construction Next Door Covered as Ensuing Loss

    Stormy Seas Ahead: 5th Circuit to Review Whether Maritime Law Applies to Offshore Service Contract

    Subcontractor Exception to Your Work Exclusion Paves the Way for Coverage

    Plans Go High Tech

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    Narberth Mayor Urges Dubious Legal Action

    Sellers of South Florida Mansion Failed to Disclose Construction Defects

    In Massachusetts, the Statute of Repose Applies to Consumer Protection Claims Against Building Contractors

    New Stormwater Climate Change Tool

    San Francisco Museum Nears $610 Million Fundraising Goal

    Slavin Doctrine and Defense from Patent Defects

    Texas LGI Homes Goes After First-Time Homeowners

    Three Attorneys Named Among The Best Lawyers in America 2018

    Contractor Jailed for Home Repair Fraud

    Whose Lease Is It Anyway: Physical Occupancy Not Required in Landlord-Tenant Dispute

    What to Know Before Building a Guesthouse

    SunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second Time

    Read Her Lips: “No New Buildings”

    Modified Plan Unveiled for Chicago's Sixth-Tallest Tower

    Flint Water Crisis Prompts Call for More Federal Oversight

    Prime Contractor & Surety’s Recovery of Attorney’s Fees in Miller Act Lawsuit

    General Contractors Can Be Sued by a Subcontractor’s Injured Employee

    Obtaining Temporary Injunction to Enforce Non-Compete Agreement

    South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

    Water Intrusion Judged Not Related to Construction
    Corporate Profile

    NUNAM IQUA ALASKA BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Nunam Iqua, Alaska Building Consultant Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Nunam Iqua, Alaska

    Three Reasons Lean Construction Principles Are Still Valid

    February 27, 2019 —
    When lean principles were first introduced to the construction industry five years ago, project managers raced to implement the production method. The internet was rife with content about how to easily overhaul a jobsite and transform it into the picture of efficiency. However, the number of lean construction critics have multiplied significantly in recent months. They claim concepts are near impossible to implement or, even worse, automation eliminates the need for deliberate human processes. These ideas are misleading. Lean principles are still valid for a few key reasons. 1. Lean involves seeing things from the customer’s point of view One of the defining principles of lean construction is understanding value from the customer’s point of view. The concept encourages stakeholders, including the owner, contractor and supplier, to come together during the early planning stage of the project. The significant level of trust created from this exercise can’t be replicated by machinery. It involves compassion, collaboration and a sense of creativity that artificial intelligence is yet to possess. Moreover, the rapport gained through this service-oriented exercise is worth the time investment. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin Clary, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Planned Everglades Reservoir at Center of Spat Between Fla.'s Gov.-Elect, Water Management District

    January 02, 2019 —
    Dec. 11 -- Florida's incoming governor stopped short of demanding South Florida water managers step down over a contentious land deal with sugar farmers, saying he would instead await a recommendation from his transition team. That doesn't mean their days may not be numbered. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

    It’s Getting Harder and Harder to be a Concrete Supplier in California

    December 04, 2018 —
    In 2015, the California state legislature passed AB 219, which amended the state’s prevailing wage law to add Labor Code section 1720.9, which requires the payment of prevailing wages to “ready-mixed concrete” drivers on state and local public works projects. Ready-mixed concrete suppliers filed suit in Allied Concrete and Supply Co. v. Baker (September 20, 2018) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, challenging the law on the ground that, because AB 219 singled out ready-mixed concrete drivers but not other drivers of materials on state and local public works projects, the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@wendel.com

    Environmental Roundup – April 2019

    May 06, 2019 —
    Besides showers, this April brought a number of notable new environmental decisions issued by the federal courts. Before your mind turns to May and its flowers, here’s a summary: 1. DC Circuit. On April 23, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit decided the case of State of New York, et al. v. EPA. In the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990, the Congress established the Northeast Ozone Transport Region, composed of the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, the District of Columbia and a portion of Virginia. Recently, several of these states requested EPA to expand this region to include the “upwind states” of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, West Virginia, and the remaining portions of Virginia. Doing so would assist the “downwind” states in complying with EPA’s 2008 Ozone standard. EPA rejected this request, which was then appealed to the DC Circuit by the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont. Because of its unique properties, ozone created by emissions in the upwind states can be transported to the downwind states, thus allegedly hampering their ability to cope with EPA ozone standards. The court agreed that EPA has the authority to expand the Northeast Transport Ozone Transport Region, but it also has the ability to exercise its reasonable discretion not to do so. In addition, the agency’s decision to rely instead on the remedies available to it in in the Clean Air Act’s “Good Neighbor” provision was reasonable and adequately justified, and the court accordingly upheld the agency’s decision. The court also noted that other remedies may be available to the downwind states, just not this one. 2. DC Circuit. The Court also decided on April 23, 2019 the case of Air Transport Association of America v. Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA held that the payments made by the City of Portland’s airport’s utility city charges for offsite stormwater drainage and Superfund remediation was not an “impermissible diversion” of airport revenues or in violation of the “Anti-Head Tax Act,” which is codified at 49 USC Section 40116(b) and which prohibits collecting a tax on persons travelling in air commerce. Here, the charges are assessed against the airport for the use by the airport of the city’s water and sewage services. The Superfund assessment is based on the fact that the Willamette River which runs through downtown Portland could make the city a Superfund potentially responsible party, and the cty is assessing all rate payers—including the airport—a Superfund assessment. The airport is federally funded and is owned and operated by the Port of Portland, and the Port pays a combined sewer, stormwater /water bill with multiple line items including these contested items. The court notes that federal law, in particular 49 USC Section 47107(k)(2), authorizes airport revenues to be used for the operating costs of the airport receiving federal funding, and the FAA could reasonably determine that these general expenses are authorized airport “operating costs” even though the city services are provided outside the boundaries of the airport. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com

    PSA: Performing Construction Work in Virginia Requires a Contractor’s License

    March 04, 2019 —
    As a Virginia construction attorney, I often get calls for assistance in dealing with payment disputes. Frequently, these calls come from out of state contractors and subcontractors that have performed work in Virginia. One of the first questions that I ask is whether these contractors and subcontractors hold a contractor license from the Commonwealth of Virginia. While most do, some do not, likely because they are unaware of the requirement in Virginia that all contractors be licensed when performing work in the Commonwealth. While I haven’t done an exhaustive survey of the statutes and regulations of every state of the union on this point, the confused silence leads me to believe that such is not a requirement in every state. The most common reaction after “I had no idea I needed one” is that the general contractor holds a license so they did not think they needed to hold one. As I stated above, this is incorrect. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Musk Backs Off Plan for Tunnel in Tony Los Angelenos' Backyard

    December 19, 2018 —
    Elon Musk’s futuristic tunneling company, Boring Co., is no longer embroiled in a lawsuit with the residents of West Los Angeles. A May lawsuit aimed at stopping the Boring Co.’s proposed tunnel under Sepulveda Boulevard has been settled, according to a notice filed at the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Neighbors in the Brentwood and Sunset Boulevard areas, near the proposed tunnel, had sued the City of Los Angeles over the Boring Co.’s plans to build a test tunnel without going through an environmental review process, as recommended in April by the city’s public works committee. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sarah McBride & Edvard Pettersson, Bloomberg

    The Irresistible Urge to Build Cities From Scratch

    November 21, 2018 —
    Embedded in the cerebral folds of every city planner who’s ever lived, there’s a cluster of neurons that lights up like Las Vegas when confronted with the possibility of a blank slate. It started with Hippodamus, the man Aristotle claimed was the father of urban planning. When the Persians destroyed his hometown of Miletus, Hippodamus discovered a bright side to catastrophe: The attackers had erased all the regrettable improvisations that, over the centuries, had made a mess of the place. Tasked with rebuilding, he seized his chance to impose order upon chaos. And so the concept of the urban grid was born. Ever since, the dream of carte blanche has proved an all-but-irresistible seduction. Leonardo da Vinci drafted detailed sketches of an “ideal city” after the plague ravaged Milan, and a few hundred years later, Frank Lloyd Wright designed a metropolis that solved the problem of vehicular congestion via a network of helicopter taxis. Every so often, this urge in city planners breaks out into a full-scale epidemic, such as the one that spread throughout Europe and North America in the early 1900s. Known as the “garden city movement,” it aimed to counter the indignities of the Industrial Revolution by creating planned communities with plenty of green space. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Monte Reel, Bloomberg

    Digital Twins – Interview with Cristina Savian

    February 11, 2019 —
    In this interview with Cristina Savian, we discuss the present and future of digital twins in the construction industry. Cristina Savian is the founder and managing director at BE-WISE, a London based consultancy firm specialized in helping start-ups and SMEs to scale-up and bring new technologies into the construction market. Cristina has over twenty years’ experience in the civil engineering and technology industries, working from small-scale traffic calming and parking schemes in UK and Italy, through to planning major events such as playing a key role as transport manager of the Greenwich Park venue during the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. She then moved to work for a multinational leading technology company, Autodesk, covering several global roles as technical and commercial lead across Europe and America. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi