BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska custom homes Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska custom home Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska hospital construction Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska tract home Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska townhome construction Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska mid-rise construction Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska concrete tilt-up Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska structural steel construction Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska housing Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska parking structure Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska production housing Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska high-rise construction Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska multi family housing Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska institutional building Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska casino resort Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska Subterranean parking Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska industrial building Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska Medical building Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska landscaping construction Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska condominiums Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska office building Building Consultant Anchorage Alaska
    Anchorage Alaska construction cost estimating expert witnessAnchorage Alaska consulting architect expert witnessAnchorage Alaska stucco expert witnessAnchorage Alaska construction claims expert witnessAnchorage Alaska building expertAnchorage Alaska architecture expert witnessAnchorage Alaska window expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Anchorage, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anchorage Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Anchorage Alaska Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Anchorage Alaska


    Wage Theft Investigations and Citations in the Construction Industry

    Verdict In Favor Of Insured Homeowner Reversed For Improper Jury Instructions

    #5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525

    Suppliers Must Also Heed “Right to Repair” Claims

    Housing Starts in U.S. Slumped More Than Forecast in March

    New Law Impacting Florida’s Statute of Repose

    Contract Change #8: Direct Communications between Owners and Contractors (law note)

    English v. RKK. . . The Rest of the Story

    Building Stagnant in Las Cruces Region

    When is Construction Put to Its “Intended Use”?

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Fell in February to Five-Month Low

    $24 Million Verdict Against Material Supplier Overturned Where Plaintiff Failed To Prove Supplier’s Negligence Or Breach Of Contract Caused A SB800 Violation

    CDJ’s #7 Topic of the Year: The Las Vegas Harmon Hotel Year-Long Demolition & Trial Begins

    Chinese Demand Rush for Australia Homes to Stay, Ausin Says

    Fraud and Construction Contracts- Like Oil and Water?

    Contractors Can No Longer Make Roof Repairs Following Their Own Inspections

    Detect and Prevent Construction Fraud

    Homebuilding Held Back by Lack of Skilled Workers

    Is Construction Defect Litigation a Cause for Lack of Condos in Minneapolis?

    The Conscious Builder – Interview with Casey Grey

    Massive Redesign Turns Newark Airport Terminal Into a Foodie Theme Park

    Duty to Defend Requires Payments Under Policy's Supplemental Payments Provision

    Public-Private Partnerships: When Will Reality Meet the Promise?

    Sureties and Bond Producers May Be Liable For a Contractor’s False Claims Act Violations

    What Made the Savannah Harbor Upgrade So Complicated?

    Eleventh Circuit Asks Georgia Supreme Court if Construction Defects Are Caused by an "Occurrence"

    Lack of Flood Insurance for New York’s Poorest Residents

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Fed Inflation Goal Is Elusive as U.S. Rents Stabilize: Economy

    Boston-area Asbestos-Abatement Firms Face Wage and Safety Complaints

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Rely on Exclusions After Incorrectly Denying Defense

    FAA Seeks Largest Fine Yet on Drones in Near-Miss Crackdown

    Is Drone Aerial Photography Really Best for Your Construction Projects?

    UCP Buys Citizen Homes

    Rooftop Owners Sue Cubs Consultant for Alleged False Statements

    Pennsylvania Reconstruction Project Beset by Problems

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit with Additional Million

    Construction Delays for China’s Bahamas Resort Project

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    Rio Olympic Infrastructure Costs of $2.3 Billion Are Set to Rise

    ZLien Startup has Discovered a Billion in Payments for Clients

    Boilerplate Contract Language on Permits could cause Problems for Contractors

    Construction Law Breaking News: California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Beacon Residential Community Association

    Pine River’s Two Harbors Now Targets Non-Prime Mortgages

    Construction Defects Are Not An Occurrence Under New York, New Jersey Law

    Personal Guarantor Cannot Escape a Personal Guarantee By…

    Preserving Your Construction Claim

    Nicholas A. Thede Joins Ball Janik LLP
    Corporate Profile

    ANCHORAGE ALASKA BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anchorage, Alaska Building Consultant Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Anchorage, Alaska

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    December 04, 2018 —
    In Am. Mining Ins. Co. v. Peters Farms, LLC,1 the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that a mining error was not a covered accident under a commercial general liability insurance policy. The central issue was whether an insured mining company’s unauthorized removal of minerals from a neighboring property was an “occurrence” that unintentionally caused “property damage” as defined by the mining company’s commercial general liability policy (“CGL Policy”). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Phillip A. Perez, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Perez may be contacted at pap@sdvlaw.com

    Survey: Workers Lack Awareness of Potentially Hazardous Nanomaterials

    December 11, 2018 —
    Microscopic nanoparticles are part of the mix in nearly 600 construction products. The particles add strength, durability and other desired characteristics. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Scott Van Voorhis, ENR
    ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

    Contractors Should Be Optimistic that the Best Value Tradeoff Process Will Be Employed by Civilian Agencies

    September 10, 2018 —
    In The Fiscal Year 2019 NDAA Imposes Government-Wide Limitations on the Use of Lowest-Price Technically Acceptable Procurements, Pillsbury attorneys Dick Oliver and Aaron Ralph are optimistic that contractors will soon have additional legal authority to demonstrate to civilian agencies that a best value tradeoff process should be employed.
    • Congress’ trend of limiting the use of the much-derided lowest price, technically acceptable (LPTA) procurement process continues.
    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    New York Court Holds Radioactive Materials Exclusion Precludes E&O Coverage for Negligent Phase I Report

    October 30, 2018 —
    In its recent decision in Merritt Environmental Consulting Corp. v. Great Divide Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175527 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2018), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York had occasion to consider the application of a radioactive materials exclusion in a professional liability policy. Great Divide’s insured, Merritt Environmental, was hired as an environmental consultant by a bank in connection with a mortgage refinance of a property located in Westchester County, New York. Merritt’s responsibility was to prepare a Phase I environmental report concerning the property, which the bank ultimately relied on in agreeing to the refinance. It was later claimed, however, that Merritt’s report failed to document the full extent of the property’s radium and uranium contamination resulting from its use in the Manhattan Project. Merritt was named in two separate lawsuits as a result of its allegedly faulty report, including one by the bank alleging that Merritt negligently prepared its report. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brian Margolies, Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
    Mr. Margolies may be contacted at bmargolies@tlsslaw.com

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    August 28, 2018 —
    A Finnish experimentation project has made cross-laminated timber construction more productive and creative by using digital modeling. The office of &’ [Emmi Keskisarja & Janne Teräsvirta & Company Architects Ltd] looks rather like a prototype workshop. Intriguing scale models, a 3D printer, and a small CNC machine all give clues about the architects’ current project. They’re determined to make wood construction more collaborative and creative using digital technologies and cross-laminated timber (CLT). Plenty of Room for Improvement “I’m going to present our KIRA-digi project at WDBE 2018 in September. Incidentally, our wooden installation will be on display during Helsinki Design Week,” says Keskisarja. “We want to communicate with the public, not just within our professional circles, as architects typically do. The theme of the week is trust, something that’s missing in today’s construction.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Court Finds That Limitation on Conditional Use Permit Results in Covered Property Damage Due to Loss of Use

    November 06, 2018 —
    In Thee Sombrero, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. (No. E067505, filed 10/25/18), a California appeals court held that a property owner’s loss of the ability to use his property as a nightclub, based on revocation of a city’s conditional use permit (“CUP”), constituted covered property damage. In Sombrero, lessees operated a nightclub under the property owner’s conditional use permit from the City of Colton. A company hired to provide security negligently allowed admission to an armed patron, who shot and killed another patron. The City revoked the owner’s permit, and the owner was only able to negotiate the reinstatement of a limited permit, for use as a banquet hall only. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Kendrick, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP and Valerie A. Moore, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP Mr. Kendrick may be contacted at ckendrick@hbblaw.com Ms. Moore may be contacted at vmoore@hbblaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    After 60 Years, I-95 Is Complete

    September 10, 2018 —
    Across the U.S., public infrastructure is crumbling because of legislative gridlock and chronic underfunding. Roads are overcrowded, bridges are well past their expiration date, and transit systems regularly face unprecedented delays. But there will be one thing to celebrate as you seethe in beach traffic this weekend—a small, strange gap in I-95 is being filled. Come September, one of the most audacious public infrastructure projects in U.S. history will be completed after more than six decades of work. Interstate 95 was the crown jewel of the American highway system championed by President Dwight Eisenhower, and yet the plan for an artery stretching the length of the East Coast almost didn’t happen—because of local lawmakers and land-owners in Mercer County, New Jersey. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Riley Griffin, Bloomberg

    Spearin Doctrine 100 Years Old and Still Thriving in the Design-Build Delivery World

    January 09, 2019 —
    The Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Spearin, [1] also referred to as the Spearin doctrine, is a landmark construction decision.[2] The Spearin doctrine provides that the Owner impliedly warrants the information, plans and specifications which an Owner provides to a General Contractor. If a Contractor is bound to build according to plans and specifications prepared by the Owner, the Contractor will not be responsible for the consequences of defects in the plans and specifications. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of John P. Ahlers, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Ahlers may be contacted at john.ahlers@acslawyers.com